2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of motion artifact on mechanomyography: A comparative study of microphones and accelerometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These applications include, for example, the characterization of neuromuscular disorders [40]- [42], the development of prosthesis and/or switch control [28], [43], studying MU activity [21], [44], [45], examining mechanical properties during exercises [46]- [48], and in investigating rehabilitation systems [49], [50]. In addition, we have found several studies which conducted research on MMG sensor development [7], [26], [51], simultaneously testing multiple sensors and comparing their effects on muscles [52], [53]. We also have summarized studies regarding the sensor placement effect on muscles [30], [54].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These applications include, for example, the characterization of neuromuscular disorders [40]- [42], the development of prosthesis and/or switch control [28], [43], studying MU activity [21], [44], [45], examining mechanical properties during exercises [46]- [48], and in investigating rehabilitation systems [49], [50]. In addition, we have found several studies which conducted research on MMG sensor development [7], [26], [51], simultaneously testing multiple sensors and comparing their effects on muscles [52], [53]. We also have summarized studies regarding the sensor placement effect on muscles [30], [54].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-structure of the tissues transmitting the vibrations (though skinfold thickness seems to have no or limited impact on the time and frequency domain parameters of the MMG) [22][23][24]; -motion artefacts originating from movements of the patient [25]; -not constant force pressing the sensor to the patient's skin [26].…”
Section: Trial Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work uses microphone collection, due to its accurate results in detecting muscle activity, and benefits of rejecting motion noise better than the other collection methods, specifically accelerometers [10].…”
Section: A Mechanomyographymentioning
confidence: 99%