The Effects of Motion Math: Bounce on Students’ Fraction Knowledge

Abstract

National assessments suggest that many students do not display proficiency with fractions. Considering that time and materials are precious resources, many educators are looking to use technology to provide supplemental instruction with low demand on the instructor. The current study utilized a multiple-baseline design to examine the effects of the Motion Math: Bounce application on the fraction quantity comparison and number line placement skills of three fifthgrade students. Results indicate that Motion Math: Bounce improved the quantity comparison skills of all three participants and the number line skills of one participant. Additionally, all three participants made improvements from pre-to posttest on a measure of general fraction knowledge. Implications for future research and intervention implementation are discussed.Nicole M. McKevett, M.A., NCSP is a doctoral candidate in the school psychology program at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Nicole's research interests include data-based decision making to inform instructional decisions for students with needs in math and writing. She is also interested in supporting districts in managing data systems for effective implementation of MTSS.Kourtney R. Kromminga, M.A. is a doctoral student in the school psychology program at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Kourtney's research examines the effects of technology-mediated interventions on student performance when compared to traditional evidence-based interventions in mathematics. Kourtney is currently funded through an Office of Special Education Programs training grant which prepares students for future faculty positions.Amelia Ruedy, B.A., is a school psychology specialist student at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Amelia's research interests include academic interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders and factors that contribute to student responsiveness for school-based interventions.Rachel Roesslein, M.A., is a school psychology graduate student at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Her research interests center around development of academic interventions for struggling learners, particularly in the area of fraction learning within mathematics. She is currently working in Minneapolis Public Schools providing school psychological services.Kristin Running, M.A., is a doctoral student in the school psychology program at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Kristin's research interests revolve around the effectiveness of academic interventions within an MTSS framework and the use of evidence-based instructional principles in interventions and core curricula.Dr. Robin S. Codding, Ph.D., is an associate professor of School Psychology at Northeastern University. Dr. Codding's work emphasizes academic interventions and associated assessment for data-based decision making, particularly in the area of mathematics. Dr. Codding was recognized as the co-recipient of the Lightner Witmer Award by APA Division 16 in 2010 for this work. She has published has over 65 peer-revi...

A Decade Review of Single‐Case Graph Construction in the Field of Learning Disabilities

“…More recently, SCRDs have been used to test the effects of interventions for students with a LD in a variety of areas including writing (e.g., Datchuk & Rogers, 2018; Shen & Troia, 2018), video modeling (e.g., Satsangi et al., 2019), and mathematics interventions (McKevett et al., 2020). Furthermore, systematic reviews designed to identify whether specific practices can be identified as EBPs for students with LD include SCRDs.…”

“…Cooper et al recommend an ordinate:abscissa ratio between 2:3 and 5:8. This recommendation, however, is not new and can be traced back to Parsonson and Baer (1978). Kubina et al (2017) selected 11 journals that publish research in the realm of behavior and randomly selected an issue every 2 years from the journal's inception up through 2011.…”

Reporting Quality of Single–Case Research Published in Learning Disabilities Journals

“…Analysis of the content of professional journals guides the field by identifying gaps and trends in the research base (MacFarland et al, 2013). Several content analyses of special education journals were conducted recently (e.g., Gage et al, 2017; Garwood et al, 2021; Hott et al, 2018; MacFarland et al, 2013; Mastropieri et al, 2009); however, none of them examined reporting quality.…”

Profil Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa dalam Memahami Konsep Pecahan dengan menggunakan Certainty of Response Index

“…Jika ditinjau darp proses belajar, Stephen & Clements (McKevett et al, 2020) menyatakan bahwa mempelajari pecahan cenderung difokuskan pada aspek prosedural dibandingkan memberikan pemahaman mendalam pada siswa. Kompleksitas pecahan menjadi bagian yang tak dapat diabaikan dalam proses pembelajaran (Eriksson & Sumpter, 2021;Lee & Hackenberg, 2014;McKevett et al, 2020), bahwa tidak ada bidang matematika di sekolah yang kaya, kompleks, dan sulit untuk diajarkan seperti pecahan.…”

“…Stephen & Clements (McKevett et al, 2020) menyatakan bahwa konsep pecahan cemderung terfokus pada aspek proseduralnya dibandingkan pada konseptualnya. Hal ini berdampak pada kerumitan bagi guru untuk mengajarkan konsep tersebut (McKevett et al, 2020), bahwa tak satupun bidang dalam matematika sekolah sekaya, sekompleks, dan sesulit untuk mengajarkannya seperti pecahan.…”