The effects of national institutions on audit research: evidence from Europe and North America

Abstract

Auditing is claimed to have become more and more a global discipline. As a result of the expansion of the international audit firm networks, and the proliferation of International Standards on Auditing, differences between national auditing practices seem to have diminished. Surprisingly, national audit research communities seem to develop rather independently, suggesting that national institutions still play an important role in the production of audit research. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to assess the effects of local institutions on audit research. To that end, evidence is provided on the production of audit research in two areas: Europe and North America. Europe is an area with high variation in auditing institutions, while North America is an area with low variation in auditing institutions. A content analysis is presented of the European and North American auditing papers published in accounting and auditing research journals in the period 1990-7. The findings of the output assessment show that, compared to North American audit research, descriptions of national auditing institutions and environments are a dominant topic of European auditing papers, and that the output in terms of journal articles is lower. Subsequently, the paper attempts to explain why the assessed European and North American auditing research differs. The paper argues that the substantial differences in national institutional environments within Europe have two effects on European auditing research. On the one hand, national differences in auditing institutions and environments are an important subject of study. On the other hand, these differences result in a segmentation of the European audit research market, which is lacking in the North American market. The existence of a large number of smaller national auditing research markets results in different incentives, output and performance measures of auditing researchers. The paper concludes with an assessment of the future of audit research as a global discipline.

Do firms pay for audit risk? Evidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort

“…As the existence of risk premiums can be documented in the institutional setting examined in this paper, it can also be expected in more litigious settings. Finally, there are relatively few studies of audit pricing in Europe, especially in European countries other than the UK (Moizer, 1992;Moizer, 1997;Maijoor et al, 2000). Hence, this study adds to the understanding of audit pricing in the European audit market.…”

Governance Structures and Contracting Out Municipal Auditing in Finland and Norway

“…On the other hand, there are some issues that make direct comparisons of the data between the two countries difficult. There are important institutional differences regarding accounting and audit between many European countries (Maijoor et al, 2000). Due to the fact that the two countries have dissimilar institutions and possibly different content in their audit services, the municipal audit fees cannot be directly compared between the two countries.…”

An Inductive Typology of Auditing Research*

“…The sample considered here is thus over three times as large as for the studies previously quoted, and extends over the whole period. Table 1 compares the scope of our study with that of Maijoor et al 2001.…”