The effects of ownership change on bank performance and risk exposure: Evidence from indonesia

Shaban, Mohamed; James, Gregory A.

doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.02.002

Cited by 94 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It was emphasized that state banks have lower performance in comparison with others. Moreover, Shaban and James (2017) also underlined the similar results by using the same methodology for Indonesia. On the other hand, Akhigbe et.…”

Section: Literature Reviewsupporting

confidence: 58%

Comparing the performance of Turkish deposit banks by using DEMATEL, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and MOORA approaches

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study is to measure the financial performance in Turkish banking sector and to combine the data mining with the multi-criteria decision-making methods. For this purpose, a text-mining process is applied to measure the pairwise comparison of the criteria and the results are used in the integrated models. DEMATEL-GRA and DEMATEL-MOORA are defined as two integrated models. The results show that integrated models give the coherent outcomes and the text-mining process could be adapted properly in the multi-criteria decision-making methods. It is also concluded that foreign banks have better performance in comparison with state and private banks.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewsupporting

confidence: 58%

Comparing the performance of Turkish deposit banks by using DEMATEL, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and MOORA approaches

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Micco et al (2007) argues that state-owned banks in developing countries have higher costs and lower profits, while those in developed countries have no significant difference in costs and profits. Some studies in the Indonesian banking industry suggest that state-owned banks are found to be less efficient (Perera et al 2007;Margono et al 2010;Shaban and James 2018).…”

Section: State Ownership In the Banking Industrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Role of Bank Regulation on Bank Performance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific Commercial Banks

Yang

Gan

2019

JRFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The banking industry is an essential financial intermediary, thus the efficient operation of banks is vital for economic development and social welfare. However, the 2008 global financial crisis triggered a reconsideration of the banking systems, as well as the role of government intervention. The literature has paid little attention to the banking industry in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of bank efficiency. This study employs double bootstrap data envelopment analysis to measure bank efficiency and examine the relationship between regulation, supervision, and state ownership in commercial banks in the Asia-Pacific region for the period 2005 to 2014. Our results indicate that excluding off-balance sheet activities in efficiency estimations lead to underestimating of the pure technical efficiency, while overestimating the scale efficiency of banks in the Asia-Pacific region. Cross-country comparisons reveal that Australian banks exhibit the highest levels of technical efficiency, while Indonesian banks exhibit the lowest average. Our bootstrap regression results suggest that bank regulation and supervision are positively related to bank technical efficiency, while state ownership is not significantly related to bank efficiency. Furthermore, our findings show that tighter regulation and supervision are significantly related to higher efficiency for small and large-sized banks.

show abstract

“…Bank size was chosen because large banks can utilize larger economies of scale and so tends to be more profitable [25]. Table I shows the results of the panel least regression test that examined the effect of various ownership structures along with bank size as control variables on bank profitability, measured by ROA.…”

Section:  Size=  mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Ownership Structure on Bank Profitability

Rosalina¹,

Nugraha²

2019

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics, Business, Entrepreneurship, and Finance (ICEBEF 2018)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine the effects of ownership structure on the profitability of banks in Indonesia. The structure of bank ownership is divided into three categories, namely government, private domestic, and foreign ownership. Bank profitability is measured by Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). This research uses bank size as a control variable. We use explanatory survey for this study. The sampling technique used is the purposive sampling method. We use secondary data obtained from the Indonesian Financial Services Authority and annual reports from each bank. We then analyze the data using panel regression testing with common effect modeling. The results show that private domestic and foreign ownership have statistically significant positive effects on bank profitability, while government ownership has a statistically significant negative effect on bank profitability.

show abstract

The effects of ownership change on bank performance and risk exposure: Evidence from indonesia

Cited by 94 publications

References 67 publications

Comparing the performance of Turkish deposit banks by using DEMATEL, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and MOORA approaches

Comparing the performance of Turkish deposit banks by using DEMATEL, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and MOORA approaches

Role of Bank Regulation on Bank Performance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific Commercial Banks

The Effects of Ownership Structure on Bank Profitability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About