2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of perceived competence and sociability on electoral outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, perceived competence can lead to desirable social outcomes. For example, inferred competence of political candidates based on facial characteristics is a reliable predictor of election outcomes (Castelli, Carraro, Ghitti, & Pastore, 2009;Rule et al, 2010;Todorov et al, 2005). In a classic study, after being exposed to the faces of two competing political candidates who were running against each other, participants made judgments about the candidates' personality traits.…”
Section: Differentiating Social Competence From Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, perceived competence can lead to desirable social outcomes. For example, inferred competence of political candidates based on facial characteristics is a reliable predictor of election outcomes (Castelli, Carraro, Ghitti, & Pastore, 2009;Rule et al, 2010;Todorov et al, 2005). In a classic study, after being exposed to the faces of two competing political candidates who were running against each other, participants made judgments about the candidates' personality traits.…”
Section: Differentiating Social Competence From Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, perceivers' ratings of personality traits from the faces of politicians predict electoral results in a variety of nations (e.g., Antonakis and Dalgas 2009;Castelli et al 2009;Todorov et al 2005;Zebrowitz and Montepare 2005). Beyond political candidates' faces biasing voters' decisions, studies also show that leaders' facial appearance relates to how well their organizations actually perform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ref. 33). A similar logic applies to facial attractiveness, whose influence we also examined: Attractiveness is valued in communicators (35) but does not predict research success (32), and may even be detrimental to having one's work taken seriously by the public (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Trust is important both to effective communication and to the scientific process (6,30,31), and trustworthy-looking scientists may enjoy greater research success (32). However, face-based inferences about morality have surprisingly weak effects in other domains where trust is important, such as politics (15,33,34), so their impact on science communication is an open question. Finally, although science is a social enterprise (6,31), scientists are often perceived as solitary and socially awkward (22,23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%