The impact of humic acid fouling on the membrane transport of two pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) -namely carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole -in forward osmosis (FO) was investigated. Deposition of humic acid onto the membrane surface was promoted by the complexation with calcium ions in the feed solution and the increase in ionic strength at the membrane surface due to the reverse transport of NaCl draw solute. The increase in the humic acid deposition on the membrane surface led to a substantial decrease in the membrane salt (NaCl) permeability coefficient but did not result in a significant decrease in the membrane pure water permeability coefficient. As the deposition of humic acid increased, the permeation of carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole decreased, which correlated well with the decrease in the membrane salt (NaCl) permeability coefficient. It is hypothesized that the hydrated humic acid fouling layer hindered solute diffusion through the membrane pore and enhanced solute rejection by steric hindrance, but not the permeation of water molecules. The membrane water and salt (NaCl) permeability coefficients were fully restored by physical cleaning of the membrane, suggesting that humic acid did not penetrate into the membrane pores.
Abstract
16The impact of humic acid fouling on the membrane transport of two pharmaceutically 17 active compounds (PhACs) -namely carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole -in forward 18 osmosis (FO) was investigated. Deposition of humic acid onto the membrane surface was 19 promoted by the complexation with calcium ions in the feed solution and the increase in ionic 20 strength at the membrane surface due to the reverse transport of NaCl draw solute. The 21 increase in the humic acid deposition on the membrane surface led to a substantial decrease 22 in the membrane salt (NaCl) permeability coefficient but did not result in a significant 23 decrease in the membrane pure water permeability coefficient. As the deposition of humic 24 acid increased, the permeation of carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole decreased, which 25 correlated well with the decrease in the membrane salt (NaCl) permeability coefficient. It is 26 hypothesized that the hydrated humic acid fouling layer hindered solute diffusion through the 27 membrane pore and enhanced solute rejection by steric hindrance, but not the permeation of 28 water molecules. The membrane water and salt (NaCl) permeability coefficients were fully 29 restored by physical cleaning of the membrane, suggesting that humic acid did not penetrate 30 into the membrane pores. 31