2012
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v5n6p158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Pre-task, On-line, and both Pre-task and On-line Planning on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy – The Case of Iranian EFL Learners’ Written Production

Abstract: Previous studies on the effect of planning on language production have revealed that planning does have a positive effect on language performance in terms of fluency, complexity, and accuracy. The present study was an attempt to investigate the effects of pre-task, on-line, and both pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, accuracy, and complexity of Iranian EFL learners' written production. Forty five Iranian learners of English performed a narrative task based on a series of six pictures. The narratives, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the low-span group tended to perform more successfully in the contexts given planning time while the high-span individuals were able to perform more successfully in the contexts without any planning time and preparation; therefore, the interaction effect between the working memory and preparation turned out to be significant in terms of the three fluency measures (p< 0.05). These results are in line with the findings of the study by Barati, Ketabi, and Piri (2012),who indicated that pre-task planning impacted the fluency (i.e., syllables per minute) of the EFL learner's written production significantly; however, it did not have a significant effect on the complexity and accuracy of the written performance. In addition, the findings of the study by Rahimpour and Safarie (2011) also indicated that pre-task planning had a significant effect on fluency, but no effect on complexity and accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In other words, the low-span group tended to perform more successfully in the contexts given planning time while the high-span individuals were able to perform more successfully in the contexts without any planning time and preparation; therefore, the interaction effect between the working memory and preparation turned out to be significant in terms of the three fluency measures (p< 0.05). These results are in line with the findings of the study by Barati, Ketabi, and Piri (2012),who indicated that pre-task planning impacted the fluency (i.e., syllables per minute) of the EFL learner's written production significantly; however, it did not have a significant effect on the complexity and accuracy of the written performance. In addition, the findings of the study by Rahimpour and Safarie (2011) also indicated that pre-task planning had a significant effect on fluency, but no effect on complexity and accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Generally, mixed results have been found regarding the impact of planning on language production. Therefore, studies on the effects of planning on second language production seem to further our understanding of the cognitive processes involved in second language (L2) production (Piri, Barati, & Ketabi, 2012).…”
Section: Previous Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Piri, Barati, and Ketabi (2012) carried out a study on the effects of pre-task, on-line, and both pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy on Iranian EFL learners' written production. Participants of the study were forty five Iranian learners of English.…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%