2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00418-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of prenatal cocaine exposure and genotype on the ultrasonic calls of infant mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it can be noted that the virtual absence of gender differences in infant mice calling is in accordance with the vast majority of the literature (Hahn et al 1997, Hahn et al 2000Hahn and Schanz 2002;Roubertoux et al 1996;but see: Hahn et al 1998). …”
Section: Within-strain Embryo-transfer: Comparison Between B6jola Andsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it can be noted that the virtual absence of gender differences in infant mice calling is in accordance with the vast majority of the literature (Hahn et al 1997, Hahn et al 2000Hahn and Schanz 2002;Roubertoux et al 1996;but see: Hahn et al 1998). …”
Section: Within-strain Embryo-transfer: Comparison Between B6jola Andsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The finding that early environmental factors can influence calling behavior is in accordance with studies on the effects of prenatal malnutrition (Tonkiss et al 2003), prenatal stress (Morgan et al 1999;Williams et al 1998), perinatal asphyxia (Calmandrei et al 2004) or pre-and postnatal exposure of various substances, like alcohol (Barron and Gilbertson 2005;Marino et al 2002;Tatolli et al 2001), cocaine (Hahn et al 2000), lead (De Marco et al 2005), aluminum (Alleva et al 1998), or carbon monoxide (Di Giovanni et al 1993) on ultrasonic calling in infant rodents. However, in the natural context, variations in maternal care might be of major importance.…”
Section: Within-strain Embryo-transfer: Comparison Between B6jola Andsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Conspecifics appear to interpret and respond to these auditory and olfactory emissions. One well-characterized method for apparent social communicative interactions in rodents is the ultrasonic vocalization that appears to be reflexively emitted by pups when they are out of the nest [Hofer, 1996;Branchi et al, 1998;Brunner et al, 1999;Winslow et al, 2000;Hofer et al, 2001;Hahn and Schanz, 2002]. The parents detect this 50 -80 kHz ultrasonic "distress" call, locate the pup, and retrieve it to the nest.…”
Section: Social Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, differences in USV rate and acoustic structures have been observed between various strains of mice or rats (Bell et al, 1972;Robinson and D'Udine, 1982;Sales, 1979;Sales and Smith, 1978), and have been shown to be linked to sex (Naito and Tonoue, 1987), single-gene mutations (Bolivar and Brown, 1994;D'Udine et al, 1982), or knockouts (Weller et al, 2001;Winslow et al, 2000). Further, selective breeding for properties of USVs (Brunelli et al, 1997(Brunelli et al, , 2002Brunelli, this issue) and selective crossing of mouse strains to produce genetic variants that were tested for effects on and correlations with USV properties (Hahn et al, 1987(Hahn et al, , 1997(Hahn et al, , 1998Hahn and Schanz, 2002;Hofer et al, 2001;Roubertoux et al, 1996;Thornton et al, this issue) have shown, in summary, that USV rate and probably all acoustic characteristics of USVs have a multiple genetic background. The numerous genetic influences acting on USV properties may add up or subtract in their effects and, depending on the postnatal age, seem to produce a mosaic of changing net-effects with or without becoming statistically significant (see also Brunelli, this issue, for further discussion).…”
Section: Sender Behavior and Signal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%