2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00148-020-00768-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of prenatal exposure to temperature extremes on birth outcomes: the case of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the exposure to cold days will substantially decrease. Because there is a negative relationship between in utero exposure to hot weather (especially in the second and third trimesters) and health at birth (Deschênes et al 2009;Sun et al 2019;Hajdu and Hajdu 2020b; Barreca and Schaller 2020;Chen et al 2020), the slight change in timing of conception could have a non-negligible impact. Further consequences are also possible, as temperature exposure during pregnancy influences adult outcomes too (Wilde et al 2017;Isen et al 2017;Fishman et al 2019;Hu and Li 2019).…”
Section: Projected Impacts Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the exposure to cold days will substantially decrease. Because there is a negative relationship between in utero exposure to hot weather (especially in the second and third trimesters) and health at birth (Deschênes et al 2009;Sun et al 2019;Hajdu and Hajdu 2020b; Barreca and Schaller 2020;Chen et al 2020), the slight change in timing of conception could have a non-negligible impact. Further consequences are also possible, as temperature exposure during pregnancy influences adult outcomes too (Wilde et al 2017;Isen et al 2017;Fishman et al 2019;Hu and Li 2019).…”
Section: Projected Impacts Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, strong health indicators at birth have been linked to positive long‐term socioeconomic outcomes such as physical health in adulthood, educational achievements, and labor earnings (Almond & Mazumder, 2011; Baguet & Dumas, 2019; Behrman & Rosenzweig, 2004; Bharadwaj et al., 2018; Xie et al., 2017). Motivated by these findings, for the last decade economists have sought to understand the impact on birth outcomes of maternal exposure to a variety of external factors: violence and conflicts (Camacho, 2008; Koppensteiner & Manacorda, 2016; Mansour & Rees, 2012; Quintana‐Domeque & Ródenas‐Serrano, 2017), natural or environmental disasters (Carrillo et al., 2020; Currie & Rossin‐Slater, 2013; Menclova & Stillman, 2020; Simeonova, 2011; Torche, 2011), weather shocks (Andalón et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2020; Deschenes & Moretti, 2009), air pollution (Currie & Walker, 2011), water scarcity (Rocha & Soares, 2015), economic crisis (Bozzoli & Quintana‐Domeque, 2014) and fasting (Almond & Mazumder, 2011). All of these factors were found to have detrimental effects on newborn health as measured by weight, gestational length, or the presence of abnormal conditions at birth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the short-term, higher ambient temperatures are associated with immediate increases in mortality for populations (Medina-Ramon et al, 2006), although the strength of this relationship has declined over the 20 th century in the U.S. as electricity and air conditioning became more widespread (Barreca et al, 2016). Prior findings have also documented how ambient temperatures in utero and during the early developmental period of life are associated with increased risk of stillbirths, decreased birth weight, and shorter aggregate lifespan for birth cohorts (Catalano et al, 2008;Catalano et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2020;Strand et al, 2011). Research examining adjacent, nondemographic outcomes of ambient temperature during gestation and early life have similarly found laterlife associations in the domains of education, employment, and earnings (Barron et al, 2018;Isen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%