2014
DOI: 10.1080/03004279.2014.904391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of presenting different types of vocabulary clusters on very young learners’ foreign language learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects include learners needing more time to acquire (Tinkham, 1993, 1997; Waring, 1997) and translate (Finkbeiner & Nicol, 2003) first (L1)–L2 word combinations that were grouped according to semantic categories than ones that were not. Similar difficulties have been observed in classroom studies (Erten & Tekin, 2008; Karabulut & Dollar, 2016). The influence of semantic clustering may also in part depend on the extent to which visual (physical) features are shared between the referents of semantically similar words.…”
Section: Background Literaturesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These effects include learners needing more time to acquire (Tinkham, 1993, 1997; Waring, 1997) and translate (Finkbeiner & Nicol, 2003) first (L1)–L2 word combinations that were grouped according to semantic categories than ones that were not. Similar difficulties have been observed in classroom studies (Erten & Tekin, 2008; Karabulut & Dollar, 2016). The influence of semantic clustering may also in part depend on the extent to which visual (physical) features are shared between the referents of semantically similar words.…”
Section: Background Literaturesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Classroom studies have shown similar problems with semantically related lists. Students showed poorer test accuracy on words learned in related sets than on those in unrelated sets (Erten & Tekin, 2008; Karabulut & Dollar, 2016; Marashi & Azarmi, 2012; Papathanasiou—adult data, 2009) and were also slower to translate the related words (Erten & Tekin, 2008).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian melalui beberapa tahapan anlisis, mulai dari analisis uji instrument melalui uji validitas dan reabilitas, uji normalitas (Harahap, 2021), uji homogenitas, uji T, uji F, uji koefisien determinasi (Hogenes, Van Oers, Diekstra, & Sklad, 2016;Karabulut & Kesli Dollar, 2016;Yakut & Aydın, 2017). Dalam teknik analisis menggunakan program statistik SPSS version 22.0 for Windows.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified