2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of qualitatively different acute physical activity interventions in real-world settings on executive functions in preadolescent children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
90
2
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
90
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Alesi and Bianco (2016) in their stud show that a football exercise program to children there were significant differences between sport and sedentary groups in coordinative skills and executive functions as visuo-spatial working memory, attention, planning and inhibition corroborating with Alesi and Bianco (2016). Schmidt and Jäger (2015) in a group-randomized controlled trial stud affirm that the inclusion of cognitive engagement in physical activity seems to be the most promising type of chronic intervention to enhance executive functions in children, providing further evidence for the importance of the new studs. In general the activities and programs that improve children's executive functions (Hillman and Kramer, 2008) improving the 8-12 year-olds' cognitive flexibility and creativity, and significantly more so than did standard physical education (Diamond and LEE, 2011;TUCKMAN, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Alesi and Bianco (2016) in their stud show that a football exercise program to children there were significant differences between sport and sedentary groups in coordinative skills and executive functions as visuo-spatial working memory, attention, planning and inhibition corroborating with Alesi and Bianco (2016). Schmidt and Jäger (2015) in a group-randomized controlled trial stud affirm that the inclusion of cognitive engagement in physical activity seems to be the most promising type of chronic intervention to enhance executive functions in children, providing further evidence for the importance of the new studs. In general the activities and programs that improve children's executive functions (Hillman and Kramer, 2008) improving the 8-12 year-olds' cognitive flexibility and creativity, and significantly more so than did standard physical education (Diamond and LEE, 2011;TUCKMAN, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[52]) indicating, for example, that participants with a higher level of fitness might profit more from acute PA in terms of cognitive performance (e.g. [21, 59]). The results of the analyses examining differential effects of the current study therefore seem contradictory to the literature on adolescents [59], because no moderating variables were discovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considering studies investigating the influence of cognitive engagement inherent in PA on the core executive functions, no study has revealed effects on cognitive flexibility. Concerning updating or inhibition (for an overview see, S1 Table), some have revealed benefits [7,1820], some no influence for the entire study sample [8,21] and some have even found detrimental effects [22,23]. Given these conflicting results and considering the vast procedural differences between studies [4], drawing ultimate conclusions regarding the influence of cognitive engagement inherent in PA on executive functions is nearly impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, an adapted version of the Simon Task [69] will be used. The tests have already been successfully used in several studies [51, 65, 70] and proved to be sensitive enough to detect both acute and chronic effects in children between the ages of 8 and 12 years. The cognitive test battery will last approx.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%