1983
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(83)90007-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of reduced ventilation on indoor air quality in an office building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
39
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The indoor climate factors were mainly at levels normally considered acceptable (20,21) and in accordance with most indoor climate studies (3,4) even where high prevalences of symptoms occur. One must therefore consider whether the prevailing methods of measuring the indoor climate give a sufficient description of the relevant exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The indoor climate factors were mainly at levels normally considered acceptable (20,21) and in accordance with most indoor climate studies (3,4) even where high prevalences of symptoms occur. One must therefore consider whether the prevailing methods of measuring the indoor climate give a sufficient description of the relevant exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Only a few epidemiologic studies have been made on the sick building syndrome (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Complaints about work-related irritation of the mucous membranes and work-related general symptoms such as headache, fatigue, and malaise were prevalent and differed significantly from one building to another without being explainable by the results of a determination of several components of indoor pollution (3,4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As defined by a working group of the World Health Organization, the "sick building syndrome" involves various nonspecific symptoms such as eye, skin and upper airway irritation, headache, and fatigue (1). Although several investigators have reported a higher prevalence of symptoms among persons working in certain "sick buildings" than among workers in other buildings (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) and many different chemicals have been quantified in indoor air (9, [10][11][12][13][14][15], only a few investigations have studied the influence of specific indoor exposures on the prevalence of the sick building syndrome (6). In addition, only few investigations have taken into consideration the influence of personal (6,16) and outdoor climatological (17,18) factors on the prevalence of the syndrome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the crosssectional approach has been widely used to investigate indoor air pollution and respiratory symptoms and lung function in children (1 ); outbreaks of building-related illness have also been investigated with this approach (9). Disadvantages include the potential for bias introduced by the tendency ofpersons adversely affected by exposure to be underrepresented in the study population and the limitations of cross-sectional data for describing longitudinal relationships between exposure and disease.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%