2016
DOI: 10.1080/0267257x.2016.1145723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of regulatory fit on customer brand engagement: an experimental study of service brand activities in social media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying social exchange theory in the context of brand engagement, scholars argue the specificity of the construct to involve 'specific subjects' (e.g., consumers, customers) and 'objects' (e.g., brands, products, firms, etc.) (Dwivedi, 2015;Hollebeek et al, 2014;Solem and Pedersen, 2016), depicting the consumerbrand relationship dimension of CBE. Consequently, CBE includes the concept of dedication and commitment on the part of the 'subject' (Hsieh and Chang, 2016), which transcends beyond the involvement concept (Hollebeek et al, 2014), and sheds light on the compelling interactive experiences and commitment to the brand (Hudson et al, 2016;Mollen and Wilson, 2010).…”
Section: Consumer Brand Engagement Via Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Applying social exchange theory in the context of brand engagement, scholars argue the specificity of the construct to involve 'specific subjects' (e.g., consumers, customers) and 'objects' (e.g., brands, products, firms, etc.) (Dwivedi, 2015;Hollebeek et al, 2014;Solem and Pedersen, 2016), depicting the consumerbrand relationship dimension of CBE. Consequently, CBE includes the concept of dedication and commitment on the part of the 'subject' (Hsieh and Chang, 2016), which transcends beyond the involvement concept (Hollebeek et al, 2014), and sheds light on the compelling interactive experiences and commitment to the brand (Hudson et al, 2016;Mollen and Wilson, 2010).…”
Section: Consumer Brand Engagement Via Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following their finding, it could be argued that social brand engagement enhances consumers' familiarity with brands (e.g., brand knowledge, brand experience, emotional attachment etc.) (Solem and Pedersen, 2016). These in turn generate interactive experiences that include consumer-to-consumer interactions in brandrelated chat rooms or on their social media platforms (Brodie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Model Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies exploring the antecedents and outcomes of engagement on social media from the last few years have opened avenues. Theories of regulatory fit, for instance, can help determine engagement types and levels on Facebook (Solem & Pedersen, 2016), and personality traits of consumers also affect engagement formation (Marbach, Lages, & Nunan, 2016). Other exploratory work also suggests that consumers engage in online community settings to reduce information search and perceived risk (Brodie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recommended using larger sets of brands, and different degrees of brand maturity, and linking the online and offline brand experience [16]. The most common limitation is the small sample that doesn't allow researchers to generalize about their results [11,12,24,31,35,48]. Consequently, studies should explore a broader array of sample types and sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%