2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/r85mw
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of repetition on belief in naturalistic settings

Abstract: In our modern well-connected world, false information spreads quickly and is often repeated multiple times. From laboratory studies, we know that this repetition can be dangerous as repetition increases belief. However, it is unclear how repetition affects belief in real-world settings. Here we examine a larger number of repetitions (16), more realistic timing of the repetitions (across two weeks), and more naturalistic exposures (text messages). 435 participants recruited from mTurk were texted true and false… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that a large number of repetitions makes the illusory truth effect more salient (e.g. [13,[33][34][35]), it is unlikely that pre-exposure to the topics was insufficient to produce the illusory truth effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that a large number of repetitions makes the illusory truth effect more salient (e.g. [13,[33][34][35]), it is unlikely that pre-exposure to the topics was insufficient to produce the illusory truth effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we cannot say which feature (or a combination thereof) is responsible for the current findings. There are reasons to think that increasing the number of repetitions from one to five increased the likelihood to find a TBR effect, as suggested by research on ambiguous statements (e.g., Fazio et al, 2021;Hassan & Barber, 2021). Likewise, using a sensitive scale increased the probability of detecting small differences of perceived truth between repeated and new statements that may be difficult to find with less sensitive dichotomous ratings or Likert scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prominent theory is based on processing fluency (Reber & Schwarz, 1999;Unkelbach, 2007): repeated statements are easier to process than new ones, and this processing fluency is used as a cue for truth. Typically, the TBR effect is demonstrated using only one previous exposure, but additional exposures (e.g., 4, 8, 16) may lead to a larger TBR effect (Arkes et al, 1991;DiFonzo et al, 2016;Fazio et al, 2021;Hassan & Barber, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this suggests the effects of false information on the choice of who people vote for are often over-stated, particularly the effects of limited or near-term exposure to false information with political overtones, this does not exclude the possibility of false information having a decisive influence on the outcome of closely fought elections in a number of ways. First, we know that both true and false information has greater effect on attitudes if repeated over time so misinformation spread over the longer term may have more effect (Fazio et al, 2021). Second, even if, as evidence suggests, 'the effects of brief exposure to persuasive messages' in election campaigns are small (Nyhan et al, 2018), persuading even a very small number of undecided voters who to vote for may have a significant effect on the election outcome, in a very closely fought race.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%