The Effects of Rural Electrification on Quality of Life: A Southeast Asian Perspective

Abstract

Despite the general agreement about the benefits that electrification brings to well-being, few studies have concentrated on the actual effects of electrification on the diverse non-economic dimensions of quality of life (QoL). In a multi-disciplinary and cross-institutional effort, a group of natural and social scientists have studied three electrification schemes (grid extension, centralised hybrid, and solar home systems) in four rural villages in Malaysia, Cambodia, and Myanmar. Using a novel approach with scales on several QoL measures (self-reported QoL and five QoL sub-domains; psychological, physical, social, and economic well-being; occupations; and total active time), this article presents an analysis of the effects of rural electrification on human well-being. With original data surveyed in the villages through a baseline prior to electrification and an endpoint several months after, the effects were examined through suitable statistical methods. Overall, we confirmed a positive effect of electrification in self-reported QoL levels as well as psychological, physical, and social well-being. There was, however, a certain reduction recorded in economic well-being. In the sub-domains of QoL, there were no changes after electrification in satisfaction levels concerning time use, time spent alone, housing, and personal safety, but a positive effect on satisfaction levels was observed in cooking. Finally, in terms of occupation, we observed no changes in the total hours dedicated to work and no prolonged active time on usual activities in the household. The findings provide support to the hypothesis of a positive effect on general QoL from electrification, but also suggest more precisely that, for specific QoL sub-domains, the effect might not necessarily exist, or in fact, may be negative. The article concludes by discussing differences determined by cultural aspects and technological limitations in each of the systems under study.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma among the Bidayuh of Sarawak, Malaysia: history and risk factors (Review)

“…In Nigeria, exposure to cooking wood fumes was the commonest and a significant risk factor associated with malignancies in the nasopharynx among females ( 80 ). Some communities in Sarawak still prefer food cooked using firewood ( 81 ). The smoke produced by burning charcoal contains various hazardous chemicals that are carcinogenic, such as dimethylbenzathracene and benzanthracene ( 82 ).…”

Assessing the Environmental-Health-Economic Co-Benefits from Solar Electricity and Thermal Heating in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

“…In recent years, the tools and types of co-benefits assessed in relevant research have grown increasingly diverse. For example, recent work has looked at the human well-being co-benefits from the implementation of the solar electrification projects for three electrification projects (grid extension, centralized hybrid, and solar home systems) in four remote communities in Malaysia, Cambodia, and Myanmar [ 31 ]. Taking a slightly different approach to co-benefits analysis, Lo et al used Heilmann’s experimentation under a top-down hierarchy framework to identify synergies between solar energy and sustainable development, concluding that a qualitative assessment of the characteristics of co-benefits of solar energy policies could help local governments leverage solar energy for sustainable development in China [ 32 ].…”

Application of the Hurricane-Based Optimization Algorithm to the Phase-Balancing Problem in Three-Phase Asymmetric Networks

“…Distribution systems have developed in an exponential growth due to the progress of society with its multiple application purposes and technological developments, which are focused on meeting the vital or material needs of human beings [1,2]. However, this growth generates problems in different distribution systems associated with load unbalance, which is caused by the impossibility of anticipating the input performance and the increase in end-users in the various nodes of the system.…”