2022
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-975x5621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of season and ontogeny in the diet of Piabarchus stramineus (Eigenmann 1908) (Characidae: Stevardiinae) from southern Brazil

Abstract: Aim In the present work we describe and analyze the diet of a small characin species, Piabarchus stramineus, from the Ibicuí River, Uruguay River Basin, southern Brazil. Methods Samples were collected monthly from April 2001 to March 2002 with seine net. All fish were measured, weighed, and had its stomach extruded for gut content analysis. Months were grouped in seasons and fish were classified within three standard length classes (SLC). We tested for possible alimentary differences between the different sea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumption of small food items by smaller fish individuals is generally associated with mouth opening and position and number of teeth (Dala-Corte et al 2016;Bonato et al 2017). In the literature, smaller individuals of characids have a diet based on small aquatic organisms such as microcrustaceans and insect larvae, showing ontogenetic variations in their diets (Araújo et al 2005;Mazzoni et al 2010;Lampert et al 2022). Unlike these studies, we did not find ontogenetic differences in the diet of M. bonita.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Consumption of small food items by smaller fish individuals is generally associated with mouth opening and position and number of teeth (Dala-Corte et al 2016;Bonato et al 2017). In the literature, smaller individuals of characids have a diet based on small aquatic organisms such as microcrustaceans and insect larvae, showing ontogenetic variations in their diets (Araújo et al 2005;Mazzoni et al 2010;Lampert et al 2022). Unlike these studies, we did not find ontogenetic differences in the diet of M. bonita.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…In these conditions, predators are typically larger in size than their prey, and this positive relationship is more common for aquatic predators compared to terrestrial predators (Potapov et al, 2019). In fact, changes in diet along fish growth affect the dynamics of aquatic communities, altering intra-or interspecific competition rate (Nakazawa, 2015) as a direct response to prey diversification (Bozza & Hahn, 2010), mainly in Neotropical fishes (e.g., Abilhoa et al, 2009;Fernando & Súarez, 2021;Lampert et al, 2022). However, this is not a hard-and-fast rule, as indicated by Layman et al (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%