“…Although ambiguity exists in a ordance's contemporary conceptualization and debates have not been settled on its ontology, such as whether or not a ordances exist independently of human perceptions, most scholars agree that research should consider the role of human actors to better understand the a ordance approach to the use of communication technologies (see Boyle & Cook, 2004;Burlamaqui & Dong, 2015;Dohn, 2009;Fayard & Weeks, 2014;Jones, 2003;Parchoma, 2014;Sanders, 1997). Some recent theoretical developments by conceptual articles, such as "perceived a ordances" and "imagined a ordances" (Fox & Holt, 2018;Nagy & Ne , 2015;Zhao, Liu, Tang, & Zhu, 2013), and empirical examinations of newly developed information technologies, such as blockchains and virtual reality (Shin, 2017;Shin & Hwang, 2020), have further foregrounded the necessity to consider human agency in a ordance studies. This relational view of a ordances contends that human agency, taking forms such as perceptions and interpretations, exerts in uences on how a ordances are eventually perceived and utilized by users for their digital behavior.…”