2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00324-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of smoking status and ventilation on environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in public areas of UK pubs and bars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
20
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study of 60 pubs in the UK, Carrington et al (2003) noted that for pubs with non-smoking areas the median concentration of fine particulate matter is reduced only by 34% of that in the smoking areas. Another study evaluated the effectiveness of ventilation and partitioning to mitigate the effects of passive smoking, and measured CO concentrations as a marker of ETS, CO 2 as a general indoor air quality indicator, and air flow measurements to estimate ventilation and infiltration rates (Kolokotroni et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their study of 60 pubs in the UK, Carrington et al (2003) noted that for pubs with non-smoking areas the median concentration of fine particulate matter is reduced only by 34% of that in the smoking areas. Another study evaluated the effectiveness of ventilation and partitioning to mitigate the effects of passive smoking, and measured CO concentrations as a marker of ETS, CO 2 as a general indoor air quality indicator, and air flow measurements to estimate ventilation and infiltration rates (Kolokotroni et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branis et al (2002) measured fine particles (PM 1 ) in four different indoor environmentsFa lecture room, a restaurant, and two types of officesFand determined that the highest concentration was in the restaurant, which allowed smoking. Carrington et al (2003) sampled particulate matter and nicotine in 60 pubs in Greater Manchester, UK and found that pubs without designated smoking sections had the highest particle concentrations; that the presence of non-smoking sections reduced particle concentrations even in the smoking areas; that some exposure to elevated particle concentrations still occurred in the non-smoking areas; and that ventilation systems did not have a significant effect on the particle concentrations. Another study in Perth, Western Australia involved air quality measurements in 20 social venues that permitted smoking and found elevated carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter concentrations (Dingle et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean levels of nicotine in smoking areas are approximately 90 g·m Ϫ3 (Table 1). This is 3 times the levels reported in bars in a review of US studies, and levels of nicotine in non-smoking areas are about 20 times higher than mean levels measured in residences in the US where smoking occurred [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Scientific evidence relating to this debate has been reported in a diverse range of publications such as the BMJ, Indoor Air and the CIBSE Journal. On inspection much of this reporting concludes negatively on the performance of ventilation systems [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%