Early Arrhythmias Resulting From Myocardial Ischaemia 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-06260-7_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Sodium Channel Inhibitors on Early Arrhythmias Associated with Acute Myocardial Ischaemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to inhibit the rapid Na+ current in cardiac muscle is one major property responsible for antiarrhythmic activity (class 1 in Vaughan Williams classification; Vaughan Williams, 1970) and such drugs are, in general, effective against early ischaemic arrhythmias (reviewed by Marshall & Winslow, 1982). For example, lignocaine and the aminosteroid Org 6001 are effective in the anaesthetized rat model used in the present studies (Kane, McDonald & Parratt, 1979;Clark et al, 1980).…”
Section: Relevance Off-adrenoceptor Blockadementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The ability to inhibit the rapid Na+ current in cardiac muscle is one major property responsible for antiarrhythmic activity (class 1 in Vaughan Williams classification; Vaughan Williams, 1970) and such drugs are, in general, effective against early ischaemic arrhythmias (reviewed by Marshall & Winslow, 1982). For example, lignocaine and the aminosteroid Org 6001 are effective in the anaesthetized rat model used in the present studies (Kane, McDonald & Parratt, 1979;Clark et al, 1980).…”
Section: Relevance Off-adrenoceptor Blockadementioning
confidence: 94%
“…No serious cardiovascular side effects have been associated with bidisomide [3]. The efficacy of class I antiarrhythmic agents against ventricular ectopic beats occurring several hours after the onset of myocardial infarction has been established in animal experiments [4,5], but there is some controversy concerning the efficacy of these drugs for early-phase ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different plasma levels of the two compounds might, therefore, account for the differential effects on VFT as seen at different times after dosing. Fibrillation thresholds are increased by sodium-channel blocking agents (Marshall & Winslow 1982;Camm 1984;Almotrefi 1985) and higher levels of Org 7797 (as adjudged from single dosing with 20 mg kg-I) would be expected at 1, as compared with 6 h after dosing. However, in the in-vitro studies on excised papillary muscle, we observed a modest, but statistically significant, reduction in V, , , with no change in resting membrane potential (indicative of a class I action) and this change in V, , , was similar in muscles excised at 1 and 6 h afier the last dose of drug was given.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%