2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(01)00175-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of sponsorship in 12-step treatment of injection drug users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
51
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with the few studies of SUD that demonstrate an association between helping others and positive substance-use outcomes (Crape et al, 2002;Pagano et al, 2004;. For each one-unit increase in level of helping behaviors (going from "rarely" to "sometimes" meeting the needs of friends or relatives), the likelihood of SUD remission more than doubled.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results are consistent with the few studies of SUD that demonstrate an association between helping others and positive substance-use outcomes (Crape et al, 2002;Pagano et al, 2004;. For each one-unit increase in level of helping behaviors (going from "rarely" to "sometimes" meeting the needs of friends or relatives), the likelihood of SUD remission more than doubled.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Investigations studying predictors of AA involvement and service have not found strong and consistent effects for demographic characteristics, with the possible exceptions of gender, employment, and age (Crape et al, 2002;Pagano et al, 2004Pagano et al, , 2007. There is some evidence to suggest that adults involved in AAH are more likely to be employed (Crape et al, 2002) and older (Pagano et al, 2004).…”
Section: Predictors Of Aa Involvementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a prospective investigation of 503 inner-city drug users recruited from the community, Crape et al (2002) report that being a sponsor was related to not using drugs at baseline (odds ratio [OR] ≈ 7) and to abstinence at 1-year follow-up (OR = 3.2), after adjusting for various demographic and clinical variables, including AA/NA attendance. They also suggest that being a sponsor may have increased abstinence likelihood because it was associated with greater treatment involvement and with motivation for lifestyle change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%