1989
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450670507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of surface active agents on jet breakup in liquid‐liquid systems

Abstract: An experimental study has been made of the effects of anionic, cationic and nonionic surface active agents on jet length, jet contraction and drop size resulting from the formation and breakup of liquid jets in another immiscible liquid, while undergoing mass transfer. Correlations previously established for uncontaminated systems with various rates of mass transfer successfully fitted the present data, when used with the diminished value of interfacial tension caused by the surfactant. Variables included nozz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, abundant empirical evidence (cf. Skelland & Walker 1989, as well as references therein) indicates that solute mass transfer substantially affects jet stability, which motivates the present analysis.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, abundant empirical evidence (cf. Skelland & Walker 1989, as well as references therein) indicates that solute mass transfer substantially affects jet stability, which motivates the present analysis.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The linear stability of a jet, uniformly covered by surfactant, has been studied for a long time [580,581] in the absence of a surrounding liquid [579,582,583] and when an external fluid is present [584][585][586]. The most remarkable general feature is that in the inviscid limit surfactants leave the linear behaviour unchanged [581,585].…”
Section: Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mashayek (1995) Hayworth & Treybal (1950) Kitamura et al (1986 Masutani & Experimental studies Goedde & Yuen (1970) Kowalewski (1996) Kumar & Hartland (1984 Adams (2000) Arai & Amagai (1999) Lin (2003) Skelland & Walker (1989) Das (1997 Tang et al (2002, Longmire et al ( 2001) Milosevic & Longmire (2002 2003) Table 1.1 Previous studies of cylindrical liquid jet instability. Figure 1.2 from Grant and Middleman (1966) shows the typical evolution of jet breakup length observed as jet discharge velocity is increased.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were conducted by Hayworth and Treybal (1950), Meister and Scheele (1969), Kitamura et al (1982), Kumar and Hartland (1984), Skelland and Walker (1989), Kato et al (2000), Longmire et al (2001) and others to study liquid-liquid jet breakup. These studies have provided useful data on droplet size and breakup length but were limited to laminar jet flow.…”
Section: Jet Instability Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%