2018
DOI: 10.3102/0162373718795053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of the Expansion of For-Profit Colleges on Student Enrollments and Outcomes at Community Colleges

Abstract: This study first examines whether public 2-year and for-profit colleges compete for the same students by examining how enrollments and program awards at public 2-year institutions are affected when a new for-profit college opens nearby. If public 2-year and for-profit institutions compete for some of the same students, then

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we find evidence of the enlarging unequal access to elite higher education for students from different family backgrounds during the enrollment expansion, which supports the effectively or expanding maintained inequality theory (Lucas, 2001;Alon, 2009). These results speak to a large body of literature on higher education enrollment expansion and access in many countries, for instance, the United States (Taubman et al, 1972;Walters, 1984;Juhn et al, 2005;Barr & Turner, 2013;Soliz, 2018), France (Deer, 2005), the United Kingdom (Walker & Zhu, 2008;Boliver, 2011;Devereux & Fan, 2011), Italy (Bratti et al, 2008;Oppedisano, 2011)), Germany (Reimer & Pollak, 2010), Turkey (Özoǧlu et al, 2016), Brazil (McCowan, 2007;Boliver, 2011;Dias et al, 2011), Ireland (McCoy & Smyth, 2011, and China (Luo et al, 2018;Ou & Hou, 2019). In particular, this paper shows new evidence of the expanding socioeconomic gaps in college access in the presence of higher education selectivity stratification.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…First, we find evidence of the enlarging unequal access to elite higher education for students from different family backgrounds during the enrollment expansion, which supports the effectively or expanding maintained inequality theory (Lucas, 2001;Alon, 2009). These results speak to a large body of literature on higher education enrollment expansion and access in many countries, for instance, the United States (Taubman et al, 1972;Walters, 1984;Juhn et al, 2005;Barr & Turner, 2013;Soliz, 2018), France (Deer, 2005), the United Kingdom (Walker & Zhu, 2008;Boliver, 2011;Devereux & Fan, 2011), Italy (Bratti et al, 2008;Oppedisano, 2011)), Germany (Reimer & Pollak, 2010), Turkey (Özoǧlu et al, 2016), Brazil (McCowan, 2007;Boliver, 2011;Dias et al, 2011), Ireland (McCoy & Smyth, 2011, and China (Luo et al, 2018;Ou & Hou, 2019). In particular, this paper shows new evidence of the expanding socioeconomic gaps in college access in the presence of higher education selectivity stratification.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This study contributes to educational planning, policy implementation research and the ways community colleges use equity-oriented reform to address and mitigate inequitable student outcomes on campus (Bensimon & Dowd, 2009;McLaughlin, 1987;Nienhusser, 2018;Soliz, 2018). Much of what has been studied examines finalized plans submitted to local, state, or federal educational agencies (Ching et al, 2018;Redding & Searby, 2020;Strunk et al, 2016); that is, focus is typically placed on planning as a product, with less known about the nuanced process of crafting a plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can also satisfy some working professional students who want to experience face-to-face instruction at their local centre. Also, face-toface instruction at a local centre may allow students to build networking into their career path (Soliz, 2018).…”
Section: Customer-oriented Servicementioning
confidence: 99%