2010
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the National School Lunch Program on education and health

Abstract: This paper estimates the effects of participating in the National School Lunch Program in the middle of the 20th century on adult health outcomes and educational attainment. I utilize an instrumental variables strategy that exploits a change in the formula used by the federal government to allocate funding to the states. Identification is achieved by the fact that different birth cohorts were exposed to different degrees to the original formula and the new formula, along with the fact that the change of the fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The act's statement of purpose indicates that a nonprofit school lunch program should be established "as a measure of national security" with the dual purposes "to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation's children and to 13 encourage the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities and other food…" Under the Act, commodities were distributed and cash payments were made to states according to a formula that was a function of per-capita income and population. The NSLP was significantly amended in 1962 to adjust the funding formula to become a function of both the program participation rate and the "assistance need rate" that was a function of the state's average per capita income (Hinrichs 2010). …”
Section: History Reforms and Policy Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The act's statement of purpose indicates that a nonprofit school lunch program should be established "as a measure of national security" with the dual purposes "to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation's children and to 13 encourage the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities and other food…" Under the Act, commodities were distributed and cash payments were made to states according to a formula that was a function of per-capita income and population. The NSLP was significantly amended in 1962 to adjust the funding formula to become a function of both the program participation rate and the "assistance need rate" that was a function of the state's average per capita income (Hinrichs 2010). …”
Section: History Reforms and Policy Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spirit of the program rollout literature described in the SNAP section above, Hinrichs (2010) leverages changes in NSLP funding formulas during the early years of the program to estimate the long-run impacts of the expansion of the program. He finds that increasing NSLP exposure in a state by 10 percentage points increases completed education by nearly 1 year for males, and one-third of a year for females.…”
Section: Nlsp and Child Health And Education Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such programs have both a positive impact on improving the nutritional intakes of the all participating children and reducing the inequalities in diet for children from different social backgrounds (Adamson et al, 2012, He, 2012, Hinrichs, 2010.…”
Section: Alternatives For the Development Of An Effective Nutritionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is potentially attributable to children's propensity to consume more food while at home, it could also be explained by the lack of access to school meal programs during the summer for non-summer school attendees. Hinrichs (2010) estimates the long-run e¤ects of participation in NSLP at its inception on health as adults and educational outcomes. To isolate the e¤ects of the participation in the NSLP from the possibly confounding in ‡uences of other federal programs like SBP, SNAP and WIC that came into existence much later, the author focuses on data from 1947.…”
Section: The Nutrition Standards Implemented Under the Smi (Stallingsmentioning
confidence: 99%