2012
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/33/3/667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the Pauli exclusion principle in determining the ionization energies of the helium atom and helium-like ions

Abstract: For helium and helium-like ions, we have examined the differences between the values of the ionization energies as calculated from the Bohr theory and those measured in experiments. We find that these differences vary linearly with the atomic number of the system. Using this result, we show how the Bohr model for single-electron systems may be modified in a simple way so that it may be applied to two-electron systems as well.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No, our purpose is to illustrate how concepts from the old theory can be applied, the results thus obtained and the shortcomings of the same, all of which can be contrasted with the modern quantum-mechanical analysis. In this sense, the objective of this paper is very similar to that of Deeney and O'Leary [14] who attribute the main shortcoming of the Bohr atom to its neglect of the Pauli principle. In this paper, we will lend support to this contention quantitatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No, our purpose is to illustrate how concepts from the old theory can be applied, the results thus obtained and the shortcomings of the same, all of which can be contrasted with the modern quantum-mechanical analysis. In this sense, the objective of this paper is very similar to that of Deeney and O'Leary [14] who attribute the main shortcoming of the Bohr atom to its neglect of the Pauli principle. In this paper, we will lend support to this contention quantitatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The ground-state energy of a two-electron atomic system within the original Bohr picture where the two electrons share the same circular orbit but displaced along it by a phase difference of π (which is the phase difference which minimizes the interelectron repulsion) can easily be shown (see e.g. reference [14]) to be E = −(Z − 1/4) 2 /2 which differs from equation ( 11) (vide infra) merely by a constant term. This result corresponds to the situation of mechanical equilibrium between the two electrons in the shared circular orbit and does not require any further approximations within the model assumptions.…”
Section: Two-electron Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the existence of α in equation (1) will reduce the repulsive electrical force between two hydrogen nuclei. According to Deeney's calculation [16], the value of α can be taken as 0.129.…”
Section: Hydrogen Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deeney et al pointed out differences between the values calculated from the Bohr Theory and those found by experiments according to atomic number Z. Author has mentioned a need for additional mechanisms, whose effects should be added to those already present in the Bohr Theory in order to account reductions in the observed ionization energies[11]. Later,Kuo presented analyses for the uncertainties in measurements of the radial position r D , radial momentum p D , relative dispersion of radial position, r r / D and the product of both uncertainties, p r D D in a non-relativistic hydrogen-like atoms depending on the quantum numbers [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%