2013
DOI: 10.19032/zkdgs.2013.09.23.3.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of the Social Responsibility of the Multinational Corporation(MNC)’s on the Management Performance - Focusing on German, France, Netherlands, and British Subsidiaries in Korea -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These countries were chosen for two primary reasons. First, both the United States and Germany have had representatively long and closely cooperative economic relationships with South Korea, thus substantially contributing to its economic progress and advancement (Chang, 2011). Many US- and Germany-based MNCs operate in the country, accounting for 19.2% of 8,695 foreign subsidiaries in Korea as of 2020 (TASIS, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These countries were chosen for two primary reasons. First, both the United States and Germany have had representatively long and closely cooperative economic relationships with South Korea, thus substantially contributing to its economic progress and advancement (Chang, 2011). Many US- and Germany-based MNCs operate in the country, accounting for 19.2% of 8,695 foreign subsidiaries in Korea as of 2020 (TASIS, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many US- and Germany-based MNCs operate in the country, accounting for 19.2% of 8,695 foreign subsidiaries in Korea as of 2020 (TASIS, 2022). Second, although they have commonalities in terms of their economic relationships with South Korea as Western-based MNCs, they differ considerably in terms of prevailing national cultures, which are rooted in their specific contextual, historical, and cultural heritages (Chang, 2011; Ferner, 1997; Kuchinke, 1999). This pronounced cultural difference provides an appropriate context for comparing variances in expected leadership effectiveness that are attributable to country of origin and organizational culture of subsidiaries in a local context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%