2014
DOI: 10.1166/nnl.2014.1674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Thickness of Source/Drain Fin on <I>P</I>-Channel FinFET Devices and the Corresponding Quantum Effects

Abstract: FinFET devices are considered to be the potential ones replacing the traditional CMOSFET in the sub-nanometer regime. The 3-D structural fins depress the leakage current from being outrageously out of control as the sizes of devices get substantially shrunk. In this study, the fin-thickness effects on the electrical performances are mainly observed. Three different kinds of thickness (namely, 0.110 m, 0.115 m, and 0.120 m) with the same channel length (0.1 m) are put into comparison. The phosphorus implants of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the threshold voltages (Vth) vary at various VGS not only for FinFET but also for MOSFET, where Vtho may be written as follows: where "FB" means flat-band voltage, Qox is the charge located in the oxide layer, Cox' is the unit capacitance, Qdep is the space charge in the depletion region, and 2|| is the basic applied VGS that causes the strongly inversed layer for Vtho. Somehow, the Equation ( 3) is rewritten as the following fitting formula: 4), f(VGS)=(1-VGS) is defined to deliberately set the condition of VGS under 1.0 V. [22] In the fitting presented in Figure 6a and 6b, =0.085 and =0.1 correspond to p=4.4×10 23 (1/m 3 ) and p=1.6163×10 22 (1/m 3 ), which help identify the thickness of strongly inversed layer to be 182 angstrom at VGS_FinFET=1.0V and 92 angstrom at VGS_MOSFET=0.4V, as referred in Figure 6c.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the threshold voltages (Vth) vary at various VGS not only for FinFET but also for MOSFET, where Vtho may be written as follows: where "FB" means flat-band voltage, Qox is the charge located in the oxide layer, Cox' is the unit capacitance, Qdep is the space charge in the depletion region, and 2|| is the basic applied VGS that causes the strongly inversed layer for Vtho. Somehow, the Equation ( 3) is rewritten as the following fitting formula: 4), f(VGS)=(1-VGS) is defined to deliberately set the condition of VGS under 1.0 V. [22] In the fitting presented in Figure 6a and 6b, =0.085 and =0.1 correspond to p=4.4×10 23 (1/m 3 ) and p=1.6163×10 22 (1/m 3 ), which help identify the thickness of strongly inversed layer to be 182 angstrom at VGS_FinFET=1.0V and 92 angstrom at VGS_MOSFET=0.4V, as referred in Figure 6c.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, one may speculate that it might have been unavoidably under the regime of quantum effects [8]. In one-dimensional approximations, carriers shall travel in between the two walls causing the extra heat [9,10] or thermal noise in the channel. On the other hand, the carriers under strong inversion require no trespassing energy over the central barrier and conduct Source and Drain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the scale of the devices shrinks, more attentions must be paid to the quantum effects [8] and their corresponding influences on the electrical characteristics. As the potential well in the fin has been built, the carriers with energy exceeding the center of the potential well may bounce back and forth in between the two walls, causing the extra heat [9,10] or thermal noise in the channel. On the other hand, the bound states nearby the oxide proceed to conduct the current as the device is strongly inversed as shown in Fig.3( C ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%