2013
DOI: 10.13005/bpj/404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Tissue Heterogeneitieson Dose Distribution of Iridium-192 Source in Brachytherapy Treatments

Abstract: The present study examines the effects of dose variation on brachytherapy treatment with Ir-192 source in the presence and absence of tissue heterogeneities.The effect of source location and distance between the heterogeneity and the source on dose distribution were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation (MCNP4C code). Soft tissue heterogeneity showed no significant effect on dose distribution. Increasing the distance between the source and the phantom center, decreases dose delivery because of reduced scatter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…radially in relation to the size of the air pocket. Outcome of our results are in at agreements with the above published literature (Celik et al, 2018;Zabihzadeh et al, 2013;Terribilini et al, 2007;Chandola et al, 2010).…”
Section: Author Contribution Statementsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…radially in relation to the size of the air pocket. Outcome of our results are in at agreements with the above published literature (Celik et al, 2018;Zabihzadeh et al, 2013;Terribilini et al, 2007;Chandola et al, 2010).…”
Section: Author Contribution Statementsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The most important point of their results is that the PDD curve of the radiation in the air medium through to the water medium is different from the only water medium. Zabihzadeh et al, (2013) have found air heterogeneity dose increases as 9.11-10.2%, 9.11-10.0%, 8.62-10.08% , air at a distance of 10 mm from the source produced heterogeneity that was 7% higher than the corresponding value of the control water medium (Terribilini et al, 2007). In a similar study, Chandola et al, (2010) have found that the corresponding doses behind heterogeneities were 5.5-6.5% higher and 4.5-5% lower than water phantom values in the presence of air and cortical bone, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomically, such disruptions cause a breakdown in dose distribution by increasing the PDD values within the BT treatment area. 15,16 Zabihzadeh et al 17 have found air heterogeneity dose increases as 9•11-10•2, 9•11-10•0, 8•62-10•08 and 8•5-10•07%, respectively, for 5, 10, 20 and 30 mm distances from the source. In a study by Terribilini et al, 18 air at a distance of 10 mm from the source produced heterogeneity that was 7% higher than the corresponding value of the control water medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…16 The function of this software is based on the AAPM TG-43 protocol in which all of the tissues are considered to be water equivalent. 17,18 On the other hand, the difference between mass absorption coefficient and electron density of different types of tissues and water 19 can introduce significant errors in the treatment planning procedure which will finally influence the accuracy of performed treatment. 20 One of the evident examples of this noncompliance is seen in esophageal brachytherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%