2008
DOI: 10.2478/v10001-008-0030-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Toluene Plus Noise on Hearing Thresholds: An Evaluation Based on Repeated Measurements in the German Printing Industry

Abstract: Objectives: The ototoxicity of occupational exposure to toluene plus noise was investigated in a longitudinal study in rotogravure printing and existing findings in the literature were evaluated. Material and Methods: The study comprised four repeated examinations during 5 years and started with 333 male workers. Lifetime weighted average exposures (LWAE) to toluene and noise were determined from individual work histories and historic recordings; recent individual exposures were measured 10 times during the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
25
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Several clinical and epidemiological studies confirmed an association between exposure to solvents (styrene, toluene, xylenes, solvent mixtures, and jet fuels) in the workplace and increased prevalence of hearing loss, as well as poor hearing thresholds beyond the traditional 4 kHz noise-related audiometric notch. [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92] For an extensive review of human studies, see Johnson and Morata 93 (available online at https:// gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/23240).…”
Section: Co-exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical and epidemiological studies confirmed an association between exposure to solvents (styrene, toluene, xylenes, solvent mixtures, and jet fuels) in the workplace and increased prevalence of hearing loss, as well as poor hearing thresholds beyond the traditional 4 kHz noise-related audiometric notch. [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92] For an extensive review of human studies, see Johnson and Morata 93 (available online at https:// gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/23240).…”
Section: Co-exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies attributed OHL found among individuals of co-exposure groups to the likely action of noise 25,38,41 . This conclusion can be questioned by observing limitations among the studies, which may have affected the quality of the analyses: absence of a control group with isolated exposure to noise 25,41 ; healthy worker effect (sole permanence at the workplace of workers with no impairment or health complaints) and inadequate case definition 25 ; or even differences between the exposure levels of agents (solvents within the allowed limit and noise considerably above the limit) 38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible biases are cited in these studies, such as inexistence of control groups, healthy worker effect 25 and inadequate definition of "case" 25,26 , which may have influenced the absence of risk of OHL in exposures at levels below recommendation.…”
Section: Toluenementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…den ototoxischen Effekt von Lärm verstärkt [80]. Andere Studien mit großen Kohorten zeigen, dass bis 172 mg/m³ keine ototoxischen Effekte auftreten [56,81,82]. Die Ototoxizität von Toluol wird durch tierexperimentelle Daten unterstützt [83,84].…”
Section: Ototoxizitätunclassified