2005
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Type 1 Diabetes on Cognitive Performance

Abstract: OBJECTIVE -To investigate the exact nature and magnitude of cognitive impairments in patients with type 1 diabetes and the possible association with other disease variables, such as recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia and metabolic control.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -MedLine and PsycLit search engines were used to identify studies on cognitive performance in patients with type 1 diabetes. Effect sizes (Cohen's d), which are the standardized differences between the experimental and the control group, were calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
402
7
22

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 656 publications
(460 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
29
402
7
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between the development of this encephalopathy and exposure to chronic hyperglycaemia, leading to microangiopathy, is not well established. A recent meta-analysis concluded that lowered cognitive performance of patients with type 1 diabetes appears not to be associated with recurrent episodes of severe hypoglycaemia, as often speculated, but rather with microvascular complications such as retinopathy [2]. A longitudinal study [3] showed that cognitive efficiency may decline over time in diabetic adults, and that this neurocognitive change may be linked, at least in part, to the occurrence of microvascular complications such as proliferative retinopathy and to elevated blood pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The relationship between the development of this encephalopathy and exposure to chronic hyperglycaemia, leading to microangiopathy, is not well established. A recent meta-analysis concluded that lowered cognitive performance of patients with type 1 diabetes appears not to be associated with recurrent episodes of severe hypoglycaemia, as often speculated, but rather with microvascular complications such as retinopathy [2]. A longitudinal study [3] showed that cognitive efficiency may decline over time in diabetic adults, and that this neurocognitive change may be linked, at least in part, to the occurrence of microvascular complications such as proliferative retinopathy and to elevated blood pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The reported prevalence is about 40% in long-standing or poorly controlled diabetes [2]. Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes is characterised by lowered performance on several cognitive domains, most notably slowing of mental speed and diminished flexibility [3]. The magnitude of these cognitive deficits appears mild to moderate, but can significantly hamper daily functioning, adversely affecting quality of life [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the relation between cognitive complaints and objective dysfunction is weak, we do not regard subjective complaints about cognitive functioning as a prerequisite for diagnosis of DACD. As cognitive dysfunction in type 1 diabetes is usually mild to moderate [3], we chose a performance >1.5 SD below that of controls as a criterion for DACD. Future research may refine the currently proposed criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, summarizing all studies and all cognitive domains (overall cognition), there is a modest but highly significant difference in cognitive performance between diabetic patients and non-diabetic control subjects. The pattern of cognitive findings does not suggest an overall impairment of cognitive function but is characterized by a slowing of mental speed and a diminished mental flexibility [17] . Although the magnitude of most of these cognitive problems is relatively modest moderate forms of cognitive dysfunction can potentially hamper everyday activities, and they can be expected to present problems in more demanding situations [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%