2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of wedge geometrical parameters and arrangement on the sound absorption coefficient – A numerical and experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A speaker at the beginning of the tube generates a plane wave with an amplitude of 1 Pa. The element type of the meshing process is considered tetrahedral element with a minimum size of 0.001 m and a maximum size of 0.1994 m which is one-tenth of the smallest wavelength according to the reference 5 .…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A speaker at the beginning of the tube generates a plane wave with an amplitude of 1 Pa. The element type of the meshing process is considered tetrahedral element with a minimum size of 0.001 m and a maximum size of 0.1994 m which is one-tenth of the smallest wavelength according to the reference 5 .…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the optimum dimensions mentioned in the second row of Table 5 is placed in an impedance tube simulated in COMSOL Multiphysics to evaluate the effect of the air gap thickness (Figure 9(a)) on the sound absorption coefficient and then the air gap thickness, from absorber's back to the solid wall at the end of the impedance tube, is changed from 0 to 15 cm in four intervals to compare with the results of reference. 5 It should be noted that, according to the ISO 10534-2 standard, 18 the distance between the furthest microphone and the tip of the chamfered pyramid must change when calculating the sound absorption coefficient each time the air gap thickness is altered since the height of the chamfered pyramid does not change. Sound absorption coefficient results of the optimum chamfered pyramid and reference 5 wedge in three different modes are reported in Figure 9(b).…”
Section: Evaluating the Effect Of Air Gap Thickness On The Sound Abso...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement was performed inside and outside the acoustic chamber, as shown in Figure 3, at a time when no product was tested, so that we could verify only the properties of the acoustic chamber, respectively the EN, as shown in Figure 4. The damping rate of the chamber depends on the shape and material of its tiling [32,33].…”
Section: Environmental Noise and Features Of The Anechoic Chambermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorbers are porous materials that absorb sound energy, while barriers are dense materials reflecting the sound and preventing sound propagation. In passive methods, it is required that the absorber or barrier depth be thick enough depending on the desired frequency to diminish the sound effectively (Tavakkoli Nejad et al, 2020; Vér, 2005). Thus, passive methods are effective for frequencies higher than 1 kHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%