2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of wheel-induced soil compaction on anchorage strength and resistance to root lodging of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it has also been reported that the yields of perennial plants were not always reduced by compaction and sometimes were larger in compacted soil than in non-compacted (Frost, 1998). These trends could be attributed to better water and nutrient supply and recovery of soil pore system (Scott et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, it has also been reported that the yields of perennial plants were not always reduced by compaction and sometimes were larger in compacted soil than in non-compacted (Frost, 1998). These trends could be attributed to better water and nutrient supply and recovery of soil pore system (Scott et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent research has identifi ed that tramlines can represent an important pathway in the loss of sediment and phosphorus from a silty clay loam soil under arable management on a 7° slope in western England (Silgram, 2004), and this is supported by Withers (2006) and Silgram et al (2007). The associated compaction caused by tramlines is also of agronomic signifi cance as it can increase lodging risk in the adjacent crop (Scott et al, 2005). Conventional agricultural systems usually attempt to maintain surface infi ltration (as this aids water conservation and reduces runoff risk), and keep soil compaction to a minimum by cultivating tramline wheeling areas during the post-harvest fi eld operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to demonstrate the suitability of the method, three different soil types utilised as part of a recent study to examine the affects of soil texture on cereal root anchorage failure (Scott et al, 2005) were impregnated using the selected varnish including a sandy loam (Newport series, stagnogleyic brown earth) from Sutton Bonington, University of Nottingham, UK (GR SK504262), a silty clay loam (Bromyard series, chromic luvisol) from ADAS Rosemaund, Herefordshire, UK (GR SO355246) and a clay (Hanslope series, calcaric endostagnic cambisol) from ADAS Boxworth, Cambridgeshire, UK (GR TL534264). Selected physical characteristics of the soils are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Experimental Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%