2020
DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x2000045x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficacy of Novel Commercial Tourniquet Designs for Extremity Hemorrhage Control: Implications for Spontaneous Responder Every Day Carry

Abstract: Introduction:Tourniquets (TQs) save lives. Although military-approved TQs appear more effective than improvised TQs in controlling exsanguinating extremity hemorrhage, their bulk may preclude every day carry (EDC) by civilian lay-providers, limiting availability during emergencies.Study Objective:The purpose of the current study was to compare the efficacy of three novel commercial TQ designs to a military-approved TQ.Methods:Nine Emergency Medicine residents evaluated four different TQ designs: Gen 7 Combat A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, it is recommended that it be re-evaluated every 30 minutes to ensure that bleeding or possible complications have been properly controlled to optimise tourniquet use (Malo et al, 2015). There is a 2-hour safe time window for the release of the tourniquet, although there are documented cases that kept the tourniquet in place for up to 6 hours (Callaway et al, 2015;Drew, Bird, et al, 2015;Ellis et al, 2020;R. B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, it is recommended that it be re-evaluated every 30 minutes to ensure that bleeding or possible complications have been properly controlled to optimise tourniquet use (Malo et al, 2015). There is a 2-hour safe time window for the release of the tourniquet, although there are documented cases that kept the tourniquet in place for up to 6 hours (Callaway et al, 2015;Drew, Bird, et al, 2015;Ellis et al, 2020;R. B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent upper limit on sustained competency without ongoing remedial training calls into question the windlass design itself. A recent study used nine emergency medicine residents to test three nonwindlass designs against the criterion standard windlass, but no design outperformed the windlass in successful application or time to apply 31 . A more intuitive design that relies less on mechanical advantage may prove to be more efficacious in real-life scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%