1986
DOI: 10.2307/1926017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficiency and Equity Consequences of Two-Part Tariffs in Electricity Pricing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural gas customers in the United States face prices inclusive of fixed distribution costs that are well above marginal cost, with one study estimating that these additional costs are comparable to a tax of over $50 per ton of carbon dioxide (Davis and Muehlegger 2010). Pricing above short-run marginal cost is also present in the electricity sector (Naughton 1986;Borenstein 2012). Equity considerations are one explanation for these markups in regulated industries (Borenstein and Davis 2012), but this issue is not restricted to regulated firms; utilities in restructured markets facing imperfect retail competition also diverge from optimal two-part tariffs (Puller and West 2013).…”
Section: Are Retail Electricity or Natural Gas Prices Too Low (Or Higmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural gas customers in the United States face prices inclusive of fixed distribution costs that are well above marginal cost, with one study estimating that these additional costs are comparable to a tax of over $50 per ton of carbon dioxide (Davis and Muehlegger 2010). Pricing above short-run marginal cost is also present in the electricity sector (Naughton 1986;Borenstein 2012). Equity considerations are one explanation for these markups in regulated industries (Borenstein and Davis 2012), but this issue is not restricted to regulated firms; utilities in restructured markets facing imperfect retail competition also diverge from optimal two-part tariffs (Puller and West 2013).…”
Section: Are Retail Electricity or Natural Gas Prices Too Low (Or Higmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsidy and equity considerations are then described by comparing the prices to marginal costs, and evaluating the impact on public bus transit demand, consumer surplus, and profits (Naughton (1986)). In the present research, estimates for user costs and external costs are not available and only production costs for firms that have been estimated.…”
Section: Efficient Transit Pricing In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, the focus of the pricing regimes in this section is on the public bus transit firms in a partial equilibrium framework following Naughton (1986) and Garcia and Reynaud 6 Refer to for a detailed derivation.…”
Section: Efficient Transit Pricing In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residential customers pay a large fraction of total revenue, but they also, therefore, impose a large fraction of total costs and with the available evidence it is difficult to make strong statements about the net burden borne by different customer classes. 13 12 In related work, Naughton (1982) tests the efficiency of price schedules for a sample of electric utilities in 1980. After estimating marginal costs using a translog cost function, Naughton finds that the per-unit prices faced by all customer classes exceed marginal costs.…”
Section: A Test Of Marginal Cost Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Natural gas combustion releases .09 pounds of nitrogen oxides and .007 pounds of particulates per McF. 21 Using estimates from Muller and Mendelsohn 19 In related work, Buchanan (1969), Barnett (1980), and Oates and Strassman (1984) consider Pigouvian taxes in the context of an unregulated monopoly. 20 There may also be negative externalities from emerging forms of natural gas production.…”
Section: Environmental Externalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%