2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electronic properties of suspended single wall carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Au(111), the middle of the band gap is measured above the Fermi level by a few hundred meV [ Fig. 1(a)], which is in agreement with previous measurements [8][9][10]13,15 and calculations. [26][27][28][29][30] Note that in the case of metallic tubes, similar behavior is found when considering the middle point between the first van Hove singularities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For Au(111), the middle of the band gap is measured above the Fermi level by a few hundred meV [ Fig. 1(a)], which is in agreement with previous measurements [8][9][10]13,15 and calculations. [26][27][28][29][30] Note that in the case of metallic tubes, similar behavior is found when considering the middle point between the first van Hove singularities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was thus shown that the configuration of adsorbed nanotubes is in good agreement with what can be expected for free-standing tubes. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, because of the interaction with the substrate, fine effects take place such as a broadening of the van Hove singularities resulting from hybridization with surface wave functions. 8,26 In the region around the Fermi level, the STS spectrum of a nanotube adsorbed on a metal is not symmetrically positioned around the zero bias voltage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,43,44 A careful look at the region around the Fermi level reveals that the STS spectrum of a nanotube adsorbed on Au(111) is not symmetrically positioned around the zero bias voltage (Figure 1(e)). The middle of the band gap is measured above the Fermi level by a few tenths of eV in agreement with the previous measurements 16,17,19,23,45 and calculations. 43,46,47 A charge transfer between the nanotube and the surface is responsible for this asymmetry in the gap and was estimated to amount 0.1 electron for an armchair tube.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…If we compare our results with already published ones, we can see that these kind of survey are mainly carried out on SW or doped-MWCNTs. Anyway we can state that currents measured with STS, in the same voltage range used by us, can vary from several nA [17][18][19] up to A 20 for semiconductor and metal CNTs as well. This means that CNTs conductivity is deeply affected by their intrinsic shape and morphology, which are influenced also by growing methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%