The Element of Fire in Dialectal Linguistic Worldview

Bolshakova, Natalia; Gladkova, Olga Kh.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39797-5_35

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, within mainstream cultures researchers address dialectal worldviews, in particular, the lexical system of Orenburg dialects (Russia) reveals a significant number of Turkic borrowings associated with the nature of the area (Bekasova, 2019). Modeling the fragment "Fire" of Pskov dialects allowed identifying more than forty toponyms related to the concept of conflagration (Bolshakova & Gladkova, 2020). Besides, researchers investigated the Teleut that is spoken by an indigenous minority of Russia, the language community totals about 2,600 people so the language is on the verge of extinction.…”

Section: Review Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The languages differ in the number of word classes, modes of verbalising the same concepts, language represents "a segmentation of the world which is not inherent in things but precisely in language" (Christmann, 1967). This accounts for the directions of research which has covered a wide array of linguistic worldview fragments, such as various lexico-semantic groups, idioms representing certain concepts; grammar forms and syntactic structures that govern the expression of the idea; ways of categorising things and phenomena as well as ways of conceptualising abstract notions (Mierzwińska-Hajnos, 2010;Daulet et al, 2019;Bolshakova & Gladkova, 2020;Humeniuk, 2021;Litvishko et al 2022). Studies have utilized either monolingual material or involved cross-linguistic analysis of worldview fragments (Barczewska et al, 2016;Alyoshin, 2018;Rudenka & Fang, 2018;Tóth, 2018;etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Modelling the Linguistic Worldview: Subject Field Scoping Review

Zakharova¹,

Baranovskaya²,

Antonova³

et al. 2022

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The linguistic worldview theory stems from Humboldt’s ideas concerning the interdependence of language and its speakers. Since Humboldt’s time national linguistic worldviews remain a challenging aspect of linguistic research accounting for a significant number of publications. Since linguistic worldview is a multi-faceted phenomenon, studies differ in terms of the facets they investigate and applied methodology. The linguistic worldview research has covered a wide array of linguistic worldview fragments and utilised monolingual material as well as cross-linguistic analysis of worldview fragments. However, so far, little attention has been paid to the analysis of this ever-increasing body of research and quite few studies have attempted to review the literature in this field. Purpose. The subject field scoping review aims to overview the available literature on national linguistic worldviews and answers the three questions: What is a diachronic change of researchers’ interest in the issue? What fragments of linguistic worldview have been investigated comprehensively? What are the most frequently used methods of modelling the linguistic worldview? Methods. The literature for the scoping review was retrieved from the three electronic databases: SciVerse Scopus, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Google Scholar. Literature selection was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). To generate a list of current research directions, which rest on the analysis of fragments of linguistic worldview, the visualisation map of authors’ key words was created using the VOSviewer software. Results and Implications. The concise scoping review of the previously published literature on linguistic worldview shows that most publications date between 2015 and 2021 and the years yielding most publications are 2018 and 2019. The number of publications mentioning linguistic worldview grew each year within the study period. The analysis of linguistic worldview fragments helped to identify six directions of researchers’ interest in the linguistic worldview field which include lexical fragments, linguistic worldview and consciousness, phraseological fragments, reflection of linguistic worldview in different discourses, linguistic worldview in translation and teaching, and grammar fragments. The most frequently used methods of modelling the linguistic worldview are an associative psycholinguistic experiment, a conceptual analysis, and a comparative method.

show abstract

Section: Review Papermentioning

confidence: 99%