The embodiment of social capital at individual and communal levels

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the study of social capital focused on the level at which it is embodied, cross-comparing two prominent camps that have emerged in the social capital literature: a communal level and an individual level. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews the intersections and departures between communal level and individual level conceptualizations of social capital according to the social dynamics of action within social exchanges that they stimulate, the processes by which social capital is activated/mobilized and the rewards they yield, and their linkages to inequality through network diversity. Findings This paper articulates new directions for future research in social capital: more analytical precision for studying returns to social capital; more efforts to transcend the individual-communal divide; the depreciation of social capital or tie decay; and recognizing the importance of ties whose value does not come from the ability to provide instrumental gain, but just from their very existence. Originality/value Social capital has informed many influential agendas in the social sciences, but the sheer volume of which has largely gone unscoped. This paper reviews this literature to provide an accessible introduction to social capital, organized by social processes foundational to sociology and a novel contribution to the literature by articulating new directions for future research in the area.

Enhancing Education and Career Pathways Through Peer and Near-Peer Social Capital

“…Research shows that implicit bias, employer discrimination, and the dearth of high-quality education and employment opportunities have resulted in many young adults of color being underrepresented in postsecondary education (Levy et al, 2016) and employment pathways (Hossain & Bloom, 2015). While all emerging adults have social capital, social capital is not equitably distributed (Au, 2019). For many young adults, their school environment during adolescence provided the social and material resources needed to access education and career opportunities.…”

Socio-economic inequality as a barrier on the path of sustainable development: “institutional traps” and perspectives of overcoming them

“…The social aspect of sustainable development as a process of provision of society's balance is studied in the works Au (2019), Eustachio et al (2019), Naderi et al (2019), Nayak et al (2019), Tacon (2019), Thakhathi (2019), and Yang et al (2019). The issues of socio-economic inequality are studied in the works Agunovich et al (2018), D'Aleo and Sergi (2017), Goyal et al (2015, 2017), Popkova and French (2017), Popkova et al (2017, 2018, 2019), Popkova and Gulzat (2020), Popkova and Zmiyak (2019), Popkova and Sergi (2018), Pritvorova et al (2018), Qerimi and Sergi (2015), Ragulina (2019), Ragulina et al (2019), Sergi et al (2019a, b), Shevyakova and Petrenko (2018) and Shevyakova et al (2019).…”

Development of social market economy under the influence of noneconomic factors: modeling and regulation

“…The foundations and applied solutions for building social market economy in the modern economic systems are studied in the works Au (2019), Felice and Krienke (2017), Goyal and Sergi (2015), Goyal et al (2017), Guizzo and Vigo de Lima (2017), Jędrzejowska-Schiffauer (2017), Morozova et al (2019), Naderi et al (2019), Nayak et al (2019), Popkova and Sergi (2020), Popkova et al (2017, 2018, 2019) and Popkova and Gulzat (2020).…”