The Emergence of ‘Conflictual Cooperation’ Amongst Parliaments in the Economic and Monetary Union

Abstract

The paper analyses the relationship amongst national parliaments (NPs) and between them and the European Parliament (EP) in the field of economic and monetary governance. In doing so it uses the principle of sincere cooperation and Chantal Mouffe's account on "conflictual consensus" to elaborate a conceptual framework for the interparliamentary relationship in this particular policy area.The paper argues that the relationship between the EP and NPs in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) is affected by the nature of the competence at stake, the mode and structure of decision-making and by the saliency of the policy. While in the field of monetary policy NPs and the EP tend to act independently of one another, in the economic governance "conflictual cooperation" among parliaments is emerging on the organization and functioning of interparliamentary relationships rather than on substantive policy options.Despite the confrontational dynamic often underlying the relationship between the EP and NPs as well as the relationships amongst NPs, the value of the vertical (and horizontal) interparliamentary cooperation is not put into question by the same institutional actors. This "conflictual cooperation" is inherent and probably inevitable in EU interparliamentary relationships and its impact can be assessed on the grounds of the ability of interparliamentary cooperation to nonetheless redress the information asymmetries parliaments are facing in the EMU with a view to positively impacting on the individual and collective ability of legislatures to scrutinize the EU fragmented executive.

The Double Democratic Deficit

“…"There is no such a thing like a NPs' unitary position on how to cope with the democratic weaknesses of the system of coordination of national economic policies. Next to the divide between Eurozone vs. non-Eurozone NPs, there are divides between parliaments of rescued countries and parliaments of the states that most prominently offered financial assistance and between parliaments of 'Southern Europe', in favour of anti-cyclical policies, and parliaments of 'Northern Europe' supporting austerity measures" (Fasone 2019).…”