2010
DOI: 10.1080/13596741003790799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The emerging dilemmas and challenges for mentors and mentees in the new context for training in‐service teachers for the Learning and Skills sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weaknesses in mentor support emanate in part from practical issues, such as lack of allocated time for mentoring and weaknesses in the infrastructure, such as availability of appropriate physical spaces for mentor meetings (Cullimore and Simmons 2010). Key aspects of an effective architecture for mentoring, identified by Cunningham (2007), include an institutional commitment to mentoring, integration of mentoring into the organisation's people development strategy, allocation of physical resources such as private rooms for meetings, resources that exemplify effective teaching practice, an appropriate mentor selection policy, a programme of induction training, support for mentors and a collegially agreed framework that sets out mentors' and mentees' roles and obligations.…”
Section: Individual Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weaknesses in mentor support emanate in part from practical issues, such as lack of allocated time for mentoring and weaknesses in the infrastructure, such as availability of appropriate physical spaces for mentor meetings (Cullimore and Simmons 2010). Key aspects of an effective architecture for mentoring, identified by Cunningham (2007), include an institutional commitment to mentoring, integration of mentoring into the organisation's people development strategy, allocation of physical resources such as private rooms for meetings, resources that exemplify effective teaching practice, an appropriate mentor selection policy, a programme of induction training, support for mentors and a collegially agreed framework that sets out mentors' and mentees' roles and obligations.…”
Section: Individual Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of functional responsibilities is identified for the mentor that includes contributing to the final assessment of trainee achievement in the programme. This stance responds to the model implicit in recent Ofsted reports (Ofsted, 2007;2008; see also Cullimore and Simmons, 2010).…”
Section: Mentoring In Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…-the preceding discussion has identified that mentor roles are illdefined and contested. Most mentors report being more comfortable adopting a developmental approach and place particular importance on the mentor/trainee relationship (Tedder and Lawy, 2009;Cullimore and Simmons, 2010). This aligns with the nurturing and caring aspects of Anderson and Shannon's (1988) model of mentoring, and encompasses a reflective practice model.…”
Section: Mentor Roles Models Of Mentoring and Social Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tedder and Lawy (2009) suggest that the uncertainty can be attributed to the different types of transition that ITE mentoring is trying to address: induction into the organisation, the subject area and the teaching profession; the contrasting models of mentoring that are in place -which are mediated by mentors' past experiences and the learning culture; and the diverse needs and expectations of trainees who enter ITE with differing prior experiences from diverse vocational and subject areas. Uncertainty about the purposes of mentoring and mentors' roles is reflected in the tensions felt at the boundaries of the mentor/trainee relationship (Ingleby, 2010) and at the boundaries of, and between, mentor roles (Cullimore and Simmons, 2010).…”
Section: Role Confusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation