2021
DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2022.1986002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The emerging role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, no vascular or immune biomarker has been sufficiently established to permit bedside decision-making to direct ICIs or anti-angiogenic agents for early breast cancer [ 7 , 11 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. For example, randomized phase III trials with pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-522 number, NCT03036488) and atezolizumab (Impassion031 number, NCT03197935) showed the consistent benefits of immunotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer across subgroups, with or without biomarker expression and programmed death receptor 1 or its ligand positivity, respectively [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, no vascular or immune biomarker has been sufficiently established to permit bedside decision-making to direct ICIs or anti-angiogenic agents for early breast cancer [ 7 , 11 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. For example, randomized phase III trials with pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-522 number, NCT03036488) and atezolizumab (Impassion031 number, NCT03197935) showed the consistent benefits of immunotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer across subgroups, with or without biomarker expression and programmed death receptor 1 or its ligand positivity, respectively [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, no vascular or immune biomarker has been sufficiently established to permit bedside decision-making to direct ICIs or anti-angiogenic agents for early breast cancer [7,11,[24][25][26][27]. For example, randomized phase III trials with pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-522 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036488) and atezolizumab (Impassion031 ClinicalTrials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the GeparNuevo trial, looking at a combination of nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy and durvalumab, showed better pCR rates only in the subgroup that received a window period of durvalumab before combined therapy; however, PD-L1 positivity was associated pCR throughout the entire cohort. 100 Based on the above, close partnership between oncologists and pathologists is vital to perform the correct PD-L1 test for the optimal immunotherapy drug for the required indication. Pembroluzimab is currently the only ICI approved for use in the neoadjuvant setting in the United States but not the United Kingdom.…”
Section: P D -L 1 I M M U N O H I S T O C H E M I S T R Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 46 patients were PD-L1+ and had a 15% ORR and a disease control rate of 24% with no response or disease control observed in those who were PD-L1−. In the other trial, in which recruited patients had previously been treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and a taxane, and were then given durvalumab and trastuzumab, no response was recorded [ 133 ]. In the phase II Kate2 trial [ 134 ], patients who were previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane were randomized to receive atezolizumab or placebo associated with T-DM1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other trials investigating NACT combined with ICIs and anti-HER2 therapies are ongoing. In the Impassion 050 trial, patients were randomized to receive atezolizumab or placebo concomitant with NACT, including doxorubiicin + cyclophosphamide, followed by paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab [ 133 , 136 ]. Atezolizumab or placebo was continued in an adjuvant setting together with trastuzumab and pertuzumab for 52 weeks overall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%