Needle core biopsy is considered the histological diagnostic method of choice for screen-detected breast lesions. Although the majority are definitively diagnosed as normal, benign, or malignant, approximately 7% are categorised as B3, of uncertain malignant potential. These include a wide range of lesions with different risks of associated malignancy from <2% to approaching 40% from literature review in UK practice. Historically, these have typically been surgically excised as a diagnostic procedure but the majority are then proven to be benign. An alternative approach, for many of these lesions, is thorough sampling/excision by vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques to exclude the presence of co-existing carcinoma. This would potentially reduce the benign open biopsy rate whilst maintaining accuracy of cancer diagnosis. A group from the Radiology, Surgery, and Pathology NHS Breast Screening Programme Co-ordinating Committees and an additional co-opted expert were charged with review and development of guidelines for the clinical management of B3 lesions. The guidelines reflect suggested practice as stated by the NHS Breast Screening Programme and approved by the Royal College of Radiologists.

Summary Background Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy. Methods We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03182634 ; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804. Findings Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96–99% (n=800, kappa 0·89–0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83–98) overall and 98% (87–100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0–23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9–49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6–48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3–17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1–33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most c...

It has been shown that the risk of breast cancer developing in certain morphologically identifiable benign breast lesions correlates with expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha). Although ER-alpha and ER-beta genes share a large degree of homology, it is generally thought that their distribution and functions are substantially different in many tissues. Recent development of reliable antibodies to ER-beta has provided this first opportunity to test the hypothesis that the likelihood of malignant transformation in morphologically benign breast lesions can be accurately defined by the distribution and level of ER-beta expression relative to that of ER-alpha. Using a monoclonal antibody, ER-beta protein expression has been analyzed in 53 normal breasts and compared with a cohort of histologically distinct breast lesions of different prognostic risk (54 hyperplasia of usual type, 35 ductal carcinoma in situ, and 141 invasive cancers). All of these tissues were also assessed for ER-alpha. Expression of ER-beta protein was also analyzed in an additional spectrum of benign breast lesions with low or negligible risk of progression to malignancy. The median proportion of cells expressing ER-beta was highest in normal breast lobules (median 94.33%, interquartile range 78.25-99.00) but declined significantly through usual ductal hyperplasia (median 76.67, interquartile range 49.17-95.00, P = 0.002) and ductal carcinoma in situ (median 70.00, interquartile range 59.00-85.00, P = 0.009) to invasive cancer (median 60.00, interquartile range 50.00-80.00, P < 0.001). An appreciable proportion (33.81%) of ER-alpha-negative invasive cancers expressed ER-beta. A high but variable level of ER-beta expression occurred in the benign lesions. The data from the intact histologic tissues were evaluated with respect to the relative expression of ER-alpha and ER-beta in five mammary cell lines of different behavioral phenotype (MCF7, ZR-75, T47D, MDAMB231, HUMA121). The highly significant differences in expression and distinct tissue distributions of ER-alpha and ER-beta within the histologic lesions of defined risk, together with the data from the cell lines, support the original hypothesis that the tissue concentration, relative occurrence, and/or interaction of these two types of estrogen receptor may play an important role in modulating mammary tumorigenesis.

Purpose: Previous conflicting results about the prognostic significance of estrogen receptor (ER)-h in breast cancer may be explained by contribution of isoforms, of which five exist. Our aim was to elucidate the prognostic significance of ERh1, ERh2, and ERh5 by immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of breast carcinomas with long-term follow-up. Experimental Design: Tissue microarrays were stained with ERh1, ERh2, and ERh5 antibodies and scored as percentage of positive tumor cells and using the Allred system. Nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was evaluated and correlated with histopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Nuclear ERh2 and ERh5, but not ERh1, significantly correlated with OS (P = 0.006, P = 0.039, and P = 0.099, respectively), and ERh2 additionally with DFS (P = 0.013). ERh2 also predicted response to endocrine therapy (P = 0.036); correlated positively with ERa, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor, and BRCA1; and correlated inversely with metastasis and vascular invasion. Tumors coexpressing ERh2 and ERa had better OS and DFS. Cytoplasmic ERh2 expression, alone or combined with nuclear staining, predicted significantly worse OS. Notably, patients with only cytoplasmic ERh2 expression had significantly worse outcome (P = 0.0014). Conclusions: This is the first study elucidating the prognostic role of ERh1, ERh2, and ERh5 in a large breast cancer series. ERh2 is a powerful prognostic indicator in breast cancer, but nuclear and cytoplasmic expression differentially affect outcome. Measuring these in clinical breast cancer could provide a more comprehensive picture of patient outcome, complementing ERa.

SummaryBreast cancer progression, treatment resistance, and relapse are thought to originate from a small population of tumor cells, breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). Identification of factors critical for BCSC function is therefore vital for the development of therapies. Here, we identify the arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 as a key in vitro and in vivo regulator of BCSC proliferation and self-renewal and establish FOXP1, a winged helix/forkhead transcription factor, as a critical effector of PRMT5-induced BCSC function. Mechanistically, PRMT5 recruitment to the FOXP1 promoter facilitates H3R2me2s, SET1 recruitment, H3K4me3, and gene expression. Our findings are clinically significant, as PRMT5 depletion within established tumor xenografts or treatment of patient-derived BCSCs with a pre-clinical PRMT5 inhibitor substantially reduces BCSC numbers. Together, our findings highlight the importance of PRMT5 in BCSC maintenance and suggest that small-molecule inhibitors of PRMT5 or downstream targets could be an effective strategy eliminating this cancer-causing population.