2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0672-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The endogenous neuronal complement inhibitor SRPX2 protects against complement-mediated synapse elimination during development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutations in this X-linked SRPX2 are associated with language disorders. Sia and colleagues recently extended these studies to demonstrated that this protein inhibits complement-dependent synapse pruning during postnatal development with region-and synapse-type specificity [7]. Understanding the molecular basis for the induction of expression and the inhibitory specificity of these newly uncovered families of proteins in the brain may provide pathways to precision therapeutics to control synaptic vulnerability to elimination.…”
Section: Regulators Of Complementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mutations in this X-linked SRPX2 are associated with language disorders. Sia and colleagues recently extended these studies to demonstrated that this protein inhibits complement-dependent synapse pruning during postnatal development with region-and synapse-type specificity [7]. Understanding the molecular basis for the induction of expression and the inhibitory specificity of these newly uncovered families of proteins in the brain may provide pathways to precision therapeutics to control synaptic vulnerability to elimination.…”
Section: Regulators Of Complementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is normally avoided by a number of circulating (C1 inhibitor, factor H, C4b-binding protein) and membraneassociated (CD46, CD55, CR1, CD59) complement regulators [6]. More recently, novel complement control proteins are being discovered, often with tissue-specific expression ( [7] and reviewed in [8]), although the domain protein structures have similar features [9]. The impact that the complement system has on human health and disease has become even more evident with the recognition that combinations of specific complement component genetic polymorphisms, collectively referred to as a "complotype" [10] confer differential sensitivity to infection and autoimmunity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spines with heads vs. without heads (Gunnersen et al, 2007). Three sushi-domaincontaining proteins, Susd2, Sez-6 (as above), and Srpx2 have been shown to regulate excitatory synapse number in culture and/or in vivo in mouse (Gunnersen et al, 2007;Nadjar et al, 2015;Sia et al, 2013;Soteros et al, 2018); evidence for a connection with the complement cascade and pruning has recently been presented for Srpx2 (Cong et al, 2020) but has not been investigated for the other sushi-domain containing proteins. Among these, only CSMD1 has been consistently associated with schizophrenia to date.…”
Section: A Broader Landscape Of Neural Complement Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the classical complement cascade is used to eliminate synapses, inhibition of the complement cascade can protect synapses against removal. Sushi domain protein SRPX2 is shown to bind directly to C1q, preventing the initiation and activation of the complement cascade, thereby preventing complementmediated synapse elimination (Cong, Soteros, Wollet, Kim, & Sia, 2020). Microglia production of C1q and C3 and regulation of lysosomal function are mediated by expression of progranulin.…”
Section: Microglia Shape Neural Circuitry By Pruning Synapsesmentioning
confidence: 99%