1966
DOI: 10.1016/0002-1571(66)90006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy-budget evaluation of the micrometeorological transfer processes within a cornfield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This numerical value agrees reasonable with that found, for example, by Brown and Covey (1966) and Impens and Lemeur ( 1969) who found (Y = 0.53 and (Y = 0.50, respectively. From Eq.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This numerical value agrees reasonable with that found, for example, by Brown and Covey (1966) and Impens and Lemeur ( 1969) who found (Y = 0.53 and (Y = 0.50, respectively. From Eq.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This assumption, however, is correct only for a very dense vegetation with no gaps. For most agricultural canopies, at daytime as well as at nighttime, there will be a net radiation flux, R,(Oh), at the soil's surface, which is not negligible (Brown and Covey, 1966;Impens and Lemeur, 1969). That is why in the present study the energy balance at the interface soil air is taken as:…”
Section: = H(oh) + Le(oh) + G (24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for the fact that solar radiation can penetrate different layers of the canopy, based on the leaf area, an exponential decay function for the upward vertical kinematic heat flux Q θ after Brown and Covey (1966) is used. Q θ is derived at each height inside the canopy by means of the downward cumulative leaf area index (LAI):…”
Section: Canopy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under steady-state conditions, these equations contain terms for advection, the source or sink strength of the entity of interest and the divergence of the turbulent transfer of the entity (e.g., Raupach and Shaw, 1982;Finnigan, 1985). Early theoretical representations of turbulent transfer in plant canopies relied on first-order closure or 'K-theory' models, where a flux is defined as the product of the vertical gradient of the entity and the eddy dfiusivity of that entity (K) (e.g., Brown and Covey, 1966). Current turbulence theory demonstrates that 'K-theory' is applicable only if turbulent length scales are much smaller than the distance associated with changes in the vertical concentration gradient of the entity (Corrsin, 1974;Bathe, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%