1999
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199905001-01861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Energy Expenditure of Snowshoeing in Packed vs Unpacked Snow at Low Level Walking Speeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Pandolfís experiments, the speeds of walking were imposed and the depth of the foot‐penetration (0, 10, and 20 cm) was measured in the footprints left in the snow by participants. Grey dots show values reported in literature for walking on snow with snowshoes (Connolly, 2002; Knapik et al. , 2002; Dalleck, DeVoe & Kravitz, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Pandolfís experiments, the speeds of walking were imposed and the depth of the foot‐penetration (0, 10, and 20 cm) was measured in the footprints left in the snow by participants. Grey dots show values reported in literature for walking on snow with snowshoes (Connolly, 2002; Knapik et al. , 2002; Dalleck, DeVoe & Kravitz, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the UAV search started at the same time as the traditional man-based method, the comparison shows an advantage for the UAV solution especially in the GRID phase where the UAV flying speed is faster (4 m/s) than walking (1 m/s (Knapik 1996;Connolly 2002)).…”
Section: Rescue Mission Times and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%