2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-6505(02)00188-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy spectrum of cosmic rays in the range 3×1017–4×1018 eV as measured with the Haverah Park array

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation from GZK depends on the set of data used as a basis for power law extrapolation from lower energies. An additional input for this analysis was the recent claim [144] that there may be technical [141], Haverah Park [142], HiRes [139], and SUGAR [46]. problems with the Yakutsk data collection.…”
Section: Propagation Of Crs In a Magnetized Neighborhood Of The Galaxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deviation from GZK depends on the set of data used as a basis for power law extrapolation from lower energies. An additional input for this analysis was the recent claim [144] that there may be technical [141], Haverah Park [142], HiRes [139], and SUGAR [46]. problems with the Yakutsk data collection.…”
Section: Propagation Of Crs In a Magnetized Neighborhood Of The Galaxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dashed line indicates the contribution from the X-decay, with initial state of 5 quarks + 5 squarks and mX = 2 × 10 12 GeV. The upper end of the spectrum as seen by different experiments (AGASA [29], HiRes [31], Fly's Eye [32] SUGAR [33], and Haverah Park [34]) is also shown for comparison.…”
Section: Event Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduce large and difficult to quantify systematic uncertainties on many cosmic ray analyses. This is a well known problem for the primary energy spectrum as derived from Monte Carlo calibrated surface detector data [1][2][3][4][5][6], as well as for the determination of the primary mass composition of high energy cosmic rays [5,[7][8][9][10][11]. The model-dependence of the interpretation of air shower data is mainly related to the differing predictions of the number of muons in air showers and the depth of the shower maximum [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%