2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-017-0706-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The entropy generation rate minimization for a proposed air ejector for the carpet industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in a large body of literature, entropy generation in the presence of turbulent flows is calculated considering only the contribution of the mean flow. This simplification has been adopted for Wells turbines [66,67,68,69,71], pipe flows [61,44], and turbine blades [51]. Herwig et al [34] demonstrated how neglecting the entropy produced by turbulent fluctuation may lead to errors in the global entropy production, as well as to misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in a large body of literature, entropy generation in the presence of turbulent flows is calculated considering only the contribution of the mean flow. This simplification has been adopted for Wells turbines [66,67,68,69,71], pipe flows [61,44], and turbine blades [51]. Herwig et al [34] demonstrated how neglecting the entropy produced by turbulent fluctuation may lead to errors in the global entropy production, as well as to misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working fluid was air, and it was considered as ideal and compressible. Some recent papers in which the fluid was considered as ideal and compressible and working under similar pressure differentials are Reference [17,18]. In the present paper, the simulations were performed under dynamic conditions, therefore matching the experimental test conditions.…”
Section: Dynamic Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum Courant number was kept below 0.8, being the time step around 5 × 10 −8 s.Turbulence intensity was set to 0.05% in all cases. The realizable k − turbulent model, along with a wall function, as previously used by Lakzian et al [18], were employed in all the simulations. The maximum y + on the wall of the nozzle was about 90.…”
Section: Dynamic Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations