2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The environmental impact of sewage and wastewater outfalls in Antarctica: An example from Davis station, East Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Davis Station survey was undertaken in 2010 to examine the effects of a sewage outfall, with sampling conducted at 26 locations at a range of distances (tens of metres to over 10 km) from the sewage outfall (Stark et al 2016b). The Davis Station survey represented a greater spatial extent than the Casey Station survey and a more diverse range of habitats from rocky reefs with macroalgae, to varying mixes of sediments and rock to very fine sediments ( Fig.…”
Section: Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Davis Station survey was undertaken in 2010 to examine the effects of a sewage outfall, with sampling conducted at 26 locations at a range of distances (tens of metres to over 10 km) from the sewage outfall (Stark et al 2016b). The Davis Station survey represented a greater spatial extent than the Casey Station survey and a more diverse range of habitats from rocky reefs with macroalgae, to varying mixes of sediments and rock to very fine sediments ( Fig.…”
Section: Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antarctica poses several challenges to the operation of conventional wastewater treatment facilities (biological systems) as the climate (cold and dry) imposes heavy energy requirements (for heating and equipment operation), which are usually provided by burning fossil fuels (Stark et al, 2015(Stark et al, , 2016). The wastewater treatment systems must cope with high load fluctuation because of the seasonal variation in the wastewater volume (there is high variation in winter and summer population at the Stations) (Stark et al, 2015(Stark et al, , 2016. The Madrid Protocol states that precautions should be taken to prevent the introduction of non-native microorganisms to Antarctica, although it does not specifically mention the risks posed by wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Madrid Protocol states that precautions should be taken to prevent the introduction of non-native microorganisms to Antarctica, although it does not specifically mention the risks posed by wastewater. Nonetheless, the Antarctic wastewater contains high levels of human enteric pathogens and non-native microbes that can survive in coastal Antarctic waters and lead to the introduction of non-native microbes as well as genetic pollution when not properly eliminated (Allinson et al, 2018;Stark et al, 2015Stark et al, , 2016. The wastewater generated at Antarctic stations has comparable characteristics to urban wastewater (a mix of human, domestic and light industrial liquid waste); however, it is more concentrated due to the water supply limitations and the absence of stormwater runoff (Stark et al, 2015(Stark et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, after a failure at a secondary treatment plant in Davis, Antarctica in 2005, macerated wastewater has beendischarged from an outfall into the environment. To determine the effects of this failure on the environment and potential human health impact, water, sediments, and wildlife were tested for human enteric bacteria and AMR(Stark et al, 2016). E. coli containing the class 1 integrase gene (int1; mobile genetic elements indicating the potential for spread of ARGs, determined via qPCR) were observed in water and sediments near the outfall, as well as in the bivalve Laternula elliptica.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%