2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.606926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Epidemiological and Mechanistic Understanding of the Neurological Manifestations of COVID-19: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and a Network Medicine Observation

Abstract: The clinical characteristics and biological effects on the nervous system of infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain poorly understood. The aim of this study is to advance epidemiological and mechanistic understanding of the neurological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using stroke as a case study. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of clinical studies reporting stroke history, intensive inflammatory response, and procoagulant state … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with a prior history of ischemic stroke, diabetes, high D-dimer levels, and other conventional risk factors for stroke are seemingly at an increased susceptibility to ischemic stroke in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection (68)(69)(70). In comparison to uninfected controls, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 exhibited a 3.6-fold augmented susceptibility to ischemic stroke (57), which is consistent with the findings of other meta-analyses (71).…”
Section: Ischemic Strokesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Individuals with a prior history of ischemic stroke, diabetes, high D-dimer levels, and other conventional risk factors for stroke are seemingly at an increased susceptibility to ischemic stroke in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection (68)(69)(70). In comparison to uninfected controls, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 exhibited a 3.6-fold augmented susceptibility to ischemic stroke (57), which is consistent with the findings of other meta-analyses (71).…”
Section: Ischemic Strokesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Serum VCAM1 levels were also significantly elevated in severe COVID-19 patients compared to mild patients and controls, and significantly decreased in the convalescence phase compared to severe patients [ 86 ]. Notably, VCAM1 also plays an important role in COVID-19-induced vasculitis [ 87 ]. RAB7A is a direct target of non-structural protein 7 (nsp7) of SARS-CoV-2 [ 29 ], and also one of the top host factors in CRISPR-Cas9-based SARS-CoV-2 datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 , 5 , 11 , 25 Compared with patients with influenza requiring hospitalization, COVID-19 patients have a 7- to 8-fold greater risk of stroke, although the CIs of these estimates are wide and overlap significantly with the risk estimates when compared with historical controls. 5 Patients with COVID-19 at the highest risk of ischemic stroke appear to be those with a history of ischemic stroke, 26 possibly a history of diabetes 4 and other traditional stroke risk factors, 27 and higher serum d -dimer levels. 28 , 29 …”
Section: Stroke As a Complication Of Sars-cov-2 Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,11,25 Compared with patients with influenza requiring hospitalization, COVID-19 patients have a 7-to 8-fold greater risk of stroke, although the CIs of these estimates are wide and overlap significantly with the risk estimates when compared with historical controls. 5 Patients with COVID-19 at the highest risk of ischemic stroke appear to be those with a history of ischemic stroke, 26 possibly a history of diabetes 4 and other traditional stroke risk factors, 27 and higher serum d-dimer levels. 28,29 Outcomes in strokes occurring in patients with COVID-19 also appear worse, in terms of initial stroke severity (compared with historical controls), 30 functional outcome at discharge (compared with contemporary and historical controls), 30,31 discharge destination (compared with historical controls), 32 and inpatient mortality (compared with both contemporary and historical controls).…”
Section: Ischemic Strokementioning
confidence: 99%