2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS)

Abstract: Context. The eROSITA X-ray telescope on board the Spectrum-Poentgen-Gamma (SPG) observatory combines a large field of view and a large collecting area in the energy range between ~0.2 and ~8.0 keV. This gives the telescope the capability to perform uniform scanning observations of large sky areas. Aims. SRG/eROSITA performed scanning observations of the ~140 square degree eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey field (the eFEDS field) as part of its performance verification phase ahead of the planned four year o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray observations will be useful in constraining the inner regions because they are more sensitive to the higher-density gas and they have higher angular resolution than SZ observations. Current data sets such as the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS; Predehl et al 2021;Brunner et al 2022) have the potential to further constrain these astrophysical models. Additionally, combining density and pressure information with other types of tracers such as metallicity profiles from line measurements could also potentially help in assessing the validity of different feedback models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray observations will be useful in constraining the inner regions because they are more sensitive to the higher-density gas and they have higher angular resolution than SZ observations. Current data sets such as the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS; Predehl et al 2021;Brunner et al 2022) have the potential to further constrain these astrophysical models. Additionally, combining density and pressure information with other types of tracers such as metallicity profiles from line measurements could also potentially help in assessing the validity of different feedback models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We limit our comparison to X-ray sources with confirmed counterparts with spectroscopic redshifts. For eFEDS, unlike the other surveys, the soft-band flux (0.2-2.3 keV) was used to estimate the hard X-ray 2-10 keV emission assuming a power-law spectral model with Γ = 1.7 since only a small number of sources were detected above 2.3 keV (<1% Brunner et al 2022). For these higher-redshift X-ray surveys we assumed a power-law spectral model with Γ = 1.7, to bring each X-ray luminosity to the rest frame by K-correcting the apparent luminosities based on the observed redshifts into the 2-10 keV rest frame.…”
Section: Survey Strategy and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaging depth is expected to match the final depth of the eROSITA All-Sky Survey in the equatorial region, by design, and is uniform with an average exposure time of ≈ 2.2 𝑘s and ≈ 1.2 𝑘s before and after the correction for vignetting, respectively. The data were processed by the pipeline eSASSusers_201009, which is described in detail in Brunner et al (2022). In what follows, we provide a brief summary.…”
Section: The Efeds Cluster Samplementioning
confidence: 99%