1980
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(80)90283-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The estimation of finite strain from the orientation distribution of passively deformed linear markers: Eigenvalue relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this method was adequate for comparing biotite mineral fabric with magnetic fabric. Fabric ellipses aspect ratios were then created from the particle orientation data according to the method described by Benn & Allard (1988), using the normalized orientation tensor (Harvey & Laxton 1980), where x and y are the direction cosines of the major axes of mineral grains: l 2 EXy'…”
Section: Particle Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this method was adequate for comparing biotite mineral fabric with magnetic fabric. Fabric ellipses aspect ratios were then created from the particle orientation data according to the method described by Benn & Allard (1988), using the normalized orientation tensor (Harvey & Laxton 1980), where x and y are the direction cosines of the major axes of mineral grains: l 2 EXy'…”
Section: Particle Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For (d) and (f) thin sections, the redrawn plagioclase lath pictures are given at the bottom with the corresponding rose of direction diagram. For the rose diagrams, lines correspond to the long axis of the mean ellipse, bold lines are the maximum direction of the distribution, and dashed bold lines represent the mean orientation given by the method of Harvey & Laxton (1980).…”
Section: Thin‐section Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitudes and orientations of the principal axes of the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility ellipsoids, Ki, 2 Ki2 2 Ki3, were determined for each specimen i of a station (i = 1,4). The magnitudes and orientations of the long ( K , ) , intermediate (K2) and short (K3) axes of the average anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility ellipsoid of a given station were obtained from K,,, (i = 1,4; j = 1, 3) by a classical eigen-vector procedure (Harvey & Laxton 1980). The susceptibility magnitude of the station is the arithmetical average K = 1/3(K, +K, + K3).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%