1984
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0781:teohgs>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Estimation of Hourly Global Solar Radiation Using a Cloud Cover Model Developed at Blytheville, Arkansas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the empirical model, described by equations 12–14 of Turner and Mujahid (), where this quantified cloudiness is used as input data, we were able to extract the solar radiation profile through equation . Having this information, and applying the obscuration function, we were led to the solar radiation empirical profile affected not only by the solar eclipse itself but also by clouds (Figures and ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the empirical model, described by equations 12–14 of Turner and Mujahid (), where this quantified cloudiness is used as input data, we were able to extract the solar radiation profile through equation . Having this information, and applying the obscuration function, we were led to the solar radiation empirical profile affected not only by the solar eclipse itself but also by clouds (Figures and ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sky solar radiation on a cloudy day mainly depends on the thickness and type of clouds (Kasten & Czeplak, ) and on the solar elevation. Turner and Mujahid (), in trying to present an empirical model to estimate the global solar radiation using a cloud cover scheme developed at Blytheville, Arkansas, found that such a scheme could be given in terms of total sky cover, TSC (or cloudiness in tenths) and cloud cover (cc), which represents the attenuation effect of different cloud‐type groups. The relationships between these two variables, expressed in tenths, as reported by these latter authors, are as follows: cc=TSC0.25em()in tenths,for0.25emlow0.25emclouds,middle clouds,or0.25emlow0.25emand middle clouds. cc=0.5TSC0.25em()in tenths0.25emfor high clouds. cc=TSC0.25em()in tenths0.5()amount of high clouds in tenths0.25emfor mixed clouds. …”
Section: Models Of the Solar Radiation Under Occultation Of The Sun Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the cloud cover fraction (cc) on days selected as overcast by the model is assumed to be equal to the maximum sky cover fraction (cc = 1) Turner and Abdulaziz (1984) developed an empirical equation to calculate the sky transmittance of overcast days as a function of the solar elevation and the cloud cover fraction. The equation has the following form:…”
Section: Predicting Mean Sky Transmittance Of Overcast Days (Kt) Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches have been used to estimate the solar radiation at the ground surface, but often rather complex input information is required (Thomas and Norris, 1982;Turner and Mujahid, 1984). For this study a very simple method was developed that gives satisfactory results.…”
Section: Modelling Of Solar Radiation On Slopesmentioning
confidence: 99%